Cargando…

Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Ji, Lin, Heather Y., Fu, Siqing, Biter, Amadeo B., Dumbrava, Ecaterina E., Karp, Daniel D., Naing, Aung, Pant, Shubham, Piha-Paul, Sarina A., Rodon, Jordi, Subbiah, Vivek, Tsimberidou, Apostolia M., Yap, Timothy A., Frumovitz, Michael M., Jazaeri, Amir A., Ramirez, Pedro T., Westin, Shannon N., Yuan, Ying, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Hong, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Innovative Healthcare Institute 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751659
http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-23
_version_ 1784880547602890752
author Son, Ji
Lin, Heather Y.
Fu, Siqing
Biter, Amadeo B.
Dumbrava, Ecaterina E.
Karp, Daniel D.
Naing, Aung
Pant, Shubham
Piha-Paul, Sarina A.
Rodon, Jordi
Subbiah, Vivek
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
Yap, Timothy A.
Frumovitz, Michael M.
Jazaeri, Amir A.
Ramirez, Pedro T.
Westin, Shannon N.
Yuan, Ying
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Hong, David S.
author_facet Son, Ji
Lin, Heather Y.
Fu, Siqing
Biter, Amadeo B.
Dumbrava, Ecaterina E.
Karp, Daniel D.
Naing, Aung
Pant, Shubham
Piha-Paul, Sarina A.
Rodon, Jordi
Subbiah, Vivek
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
Yap, Timothy A.
Frumovitz, Michael M.
Jazaeri, Amir A.
Ramirez, Pedro T.
Westin, Shannon N.
Yuan, Ying
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Hong, David S.
author_sort Son, Ji
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20–74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1–7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0–5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0–10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; p = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; p < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; p = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; p = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9888522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Innovative Healthcare Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98885222023-02-06 Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer Son, Ji Lin, Heather Y. Fu, Siqing Biter, Amadeo B. Dumbrava, Ecaterina E. Karp, Daniel D. Naing, Aung Pant, Shubham Piha-Paul, Sarina A. Rodon, Jordi Subbiah, Vivek Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. Yap, Timothy A. Frumovitz, Michael M. Jazaeri, Amir A. Ramirez, Pedro T. Westin, Shannon N. Yuan, Ying Meric-Bernstam, Funda Hong, David S. J Immunother Precis Oncol Research Articles INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20–74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1–7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0–5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0–10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; p = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; p < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; p = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; p = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Innovative Healthcare Institute 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9888522/ /pubmed/36751659 http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-23 Text en © 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is published under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Son, Ji
Lin, Heather Y.
Fu, Siqing
Biter, Amadeo B.
Dumbrava, Ecaterina E.
Karp, Daniel D.
Naing, Aung
Pant, Shubham
Piha-Paul, Sarina A.
Rodon, Jordi
Subbiah, Vivek
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
Yap, Timothy A.
Frumovitz, Michael M.
Jazaeri, Amir A.
Ramirez, Pedro T.
Westin, Shannon N.
Yuan, Ying
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Hong, David S.
Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title_full Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title_short Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
title_sort predictors of oncologic outcome in patients receiving phase i investigational therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751659
http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-23
work_keys_str_mv AT sonji predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT linheathery predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT fusiqing predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT biteramadeob predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT dumbravaecaterinae predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT karpdanield predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT naingaung predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT pantshubham predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT pihapaulsarinaa predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT rodonjordi predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT subbiahvivek predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT tsimberidouapostoliam predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT yaptimothya predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT frumovitzmichaelm predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT jazaeriamira predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT ramirezpedrot predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT westinshannonn predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT yuanying predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT mericbernstamfunda predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT hongdavids predictorsofoncologicoutcomeinpatientsreceivingphaseiinvestigationaltherapyforrecurrentormetastaticcervicalcancer