Cargando…
Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘earl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241 |
_version_ | 1784880553007251456 |
---|---|
author | Gil, Natalie Su, Helen Kaur, Kirandeep Barnett, Michael Murray, Anna Duffy, Stephen von Wagner, Christian Kerrison, Robert S |
author_facet | Gil, Natalie Su, Helen Kaur, Kirandeep Barnett, Michael Murray, Anna Duffy, Stephen von Wagner, Christian Kerrison, Robert S |
author_sort | Gil, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘early adopter’ site in England. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. RESULTS: The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that ‘not knowing the purpose of the test’ caused ‘anxiety’ and ‘confusion’, which led to dissatisfaction. ‘Not receiving results from GP’ was considered ‘unacceptable’, as this left patients with a ‘niggling doubt’ and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9888563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98885632023-02-07 Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation Gil, Natalie Su, Helen Kaur, Kirandeep Barnett, Michael Murray, Anna Duffy, Stephen von Wagner, Christian Kerrison, Robert S Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘early adopter’ site in England. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. RESULTS: The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that ‘not knowing the purpose of the test’ caused ‘anxiety’ and ‘confusion’, which led to dissatisfaction. ‘Not receiving results from GP’ was considered ‘unacceptable’, as this left patients with a ‘niggling doubt’ and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9888563/ /pubmed/36702594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Research Gil, Natalie Su, Helen Kaur, Kirandeep Barnett, Michael Murray, Anna Duffy, Stephen von Wagner, Christian Kerrison, Robert S Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title | Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full | Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title_fullStr | Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title_short | Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
title_sort | patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilnatalie patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT suhelen patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT kaurkirandeep patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT barnettmichael patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT murrayanna patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT duffystephen patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT vonwagnerchristian patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation AT kerrisonroberts patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation |