Cargando…

Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘earl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gil, Natalie, Su, Helen, Kaur, Kirandeep, Barnett, Michael, Murray, Anna, Duffy, Stephen, von Wagner, Christian, Kerrison, Robert S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241
_version_ 1784880553007251456
author Gil, Natalie
Su, Helen
Kaur, Kirandeep
Barnett, Michael
Murray, Anna
Duffy, Stephen
von Wagner, Christian
Kerrison, Robert S
author_facet Gil, Natalie
Su, Helen
Kaur, Kirandeep
Barnett, Michael
Murray, Anna
Duffy, Stephen
von Wagner, Christian
Kerrison, Robert S
author_sort Gil, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘early adopter’ site in England. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. RESULTS: The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that ‘not knowing the purpose of the test’ caused ‘anxiety’ and ‘confusion’, which led to dissatisfaction. ‘Not receiving results from GP’ was considered ‘unacceptable’, as this left patients with a ‘niggling doubt’ and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9888563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98885632023-02-07 Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation Gil, Natalie Su, Helen Kaur, Kirandeep Barnett, Michael Murray, Anna Duffy, Stephen von Wagner, Christian Kerrison, Robert S Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population. AIM: To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an ‘early adopter’ site in England. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts. RESULTS: The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both P-values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both P-values <0.05). Interviews with responders (n = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that ‘not knowing the purpose of the test’ caused ‘anxiety’ and ‘confusion’, which led to dissatisfaction. ‘Not receiving results from GP’ was considered ‘unacceptable’, as this left patients with a ‘niggling doubt’ and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9888563/ /pubmed/36702594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Gil, Natalie
Su, Helen
Kaur, Kirandeep
Barnett, Michael
Murray, Anna
Duffy, Stephen
von Wagner, Christian
Kerrison, Robert S
Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title_full Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title_fullStr Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title_short Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
title_sort patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241
work_keys_str_mv AT gilnatalie patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT suhelen patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT kaurkirandeep patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT barnettmichael patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT murrayanna patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT duffystephen patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT vonwagnerchristian patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation
AT kerrisonroberts patientexperienceandsatisfactionwithsymptomaticfaecalimmunochemicaltestinganexplanatorysequentialmixedmethodsevaluation