Cargando…

Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems

OBJECTIVE: To compare two agents that can induce a rat model of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) by chemical induction: monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) and collagenase type 2 (Col-2). We wished to ascertain the best agent for assessing drug-delivery systems (DDSs). METHOD: Male Wistar rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barry, Florent, Chai, Feng, Chijcheapaza-Flores, Henry, Garcia-Fernandez, Maria José, Blanchemain, Nicolas, Nicot, Romain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281135
_version_ 1784880571808219136
author Barry, Florent
Chai, Feng
Chijcheapaza-Flores, Henry
Garcia-Fernandez, Maria José
Blanchemain, Nicolas
Nicot, Romain
author_facet Barry, Florent
Chai, Feng
Chijcheapaza-Flores, Henry
Garcia-Fernandez, Maria José
Blanchemain, Nicolas
Nicot, Romain
author_sort Barry, Florent
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare two agents that can induce a rat model of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) by chemical induction: monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) and collagenase type 2 (Col-2). We wished to ascertain the best agent for assessing drug-delivery systems (DDSs). METHOD: Male Wistar rats underwent intra-articular injection with MIA or Col-2. They were manipulated for 30 days. The head withdrawal threshold (HWT), immunohistological assessment, and positron emission tomography (PET) were used to evaluate the relevance of our models. RESULTS: For both the MIA and Col-2 groups, pain persisted for 30 days after injection. Change in the HWT showed that Col-2 elicited a strong action initially that decreased progressively. MIA had a constant action upon pain behavior. Histology of TMJ tissue from both groups showed progressive degradation of TMJ components. CONCLUSIONS: MIA and Col-2 induced orofacial pain by their local chemical action on TMJs. However, based on a prolonged and greater sustained effect on the pain threshold, persistent histological changes, and imaging results, MIA appeared to be more suitable for creation of a rat model of TMJOA for the study of DDSs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9888674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98886742023-02-01 Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems Barry, Florent Chai, Feng Chijcheapaza-Flores, Henry Garcia-Fernandez, Maria José Blanchemain, Nicolas Nicot, Romain PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare two agents that can induce a rat model of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) by chemical induction: monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) and collagenase type 2 (Col-2). We wished to ascertain the best agent for assessing drug-delivery systems (DDSs). METHOD: Male Wistar rats underwent intra-articular injection with MIA or Col-2. They were manipulated for 30 days. The head withdrawal threshold (HWT), immunohistological assessment, and positron emission tomography (PET) were used to evaluate the relevance of our models. RESULTS: For both the MIA and Col-2 groups, pain persisted for 30 days after injection. Change in the HWT showed that Col-2 elicited a strong action initially that decreased progressively. MIA had a constant action upon pain behavior. Histology of TMJ tissue from both groups showed progressive degradation of TMJ components. CONCLUSIONS: MIA and Col-2 induced orofacial pain by their local chemical action on TMJs. However, based on a prolonged and greater sustained effect on the pain threshold, persistent histological changes, and imaging results, MIA appeared to be more suitable for creation of a rat model of TMJOA for the study of DDSs. Public Library of Science 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9888674/ /pubmed/36719872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281135 Text en © 2023 Barry et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barry, Florent
Chai, Feng
Chijcheapaza-Flores, Henry
Garcia-Fernandez, Maria José
Blanchemain, Nicolas
Nicot, Romain
Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title_full Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title_fullStr Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title_short Comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type II) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
title_sort comparison of chemical-induced temporomandibular osteoarthritis rat models (monosodium iodoacetate versus collagenase type ii) for the study of prolonged drug delivery systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281135
work_keys_str_mv AT barryflorent comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems
AT chaifeng comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems
AT chijcheapazafloreshenry comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems
AT garciafernandezmariajose comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems
AT blanchemainnicolas comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems
AT nicotromain comparisonofchemicalinducedtemporomandibularosteoarthritisratmodelsmonosodiumiodoacetateversuscollagenasetypeiiforthestudyofprolongeddrugdeliverysystems