Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the main therapeutic drug for cholestasis, but its use in children is controversial. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis. METHODS: We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Liang, Li, Siyu, Chen, Jingjing, Zhu, Yu, Lan, Ke, Zeng, Linan, Jiang, Xuehua, Zhang, Lingli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280691
_version_ 1784880580549148672
author Huang, Liang
Li, Siyu
Chen, Jingjing
Zhu, Yu
Lan, Ke
Zeng, Linan
Jiang, Xuehua
Zhang, Lingli
author_facet Huang, Liang
Li, Siyu
Chen, Jingjing
Zhu, Yu
Lan, Ke
Zeng, Linan
Jiang, Xuehua
Zhang, Lingli
author_sort Huang, Liang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the main therapeutic drug for cholestasis, but its use in children is controversial. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis. METHODS: We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from the establishment of databases to July 2022. Eligible studies included Chinese or English randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of no UDCA (placebo or blank control) and UDCA in children with cholestasis. This study had been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022354052). RESULTS: A total of 32 RCTs proved eligible, which included 2153 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that UDCA could improve symptoms of children with cholestasis (risk ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.29; moderate quality of evidence), and serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and total bile acid (low quality of evidence). For some children with specific cholestasis, UDCA could also effectively drop serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis) and γ-glutamyl transferase (infantile hepatitis syndrome, parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis). The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of UDCA in children were gastrointestinal adverse reactions, with an incidence of 10.63% (67/630). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ADRs between UDCA and placebo/blank control groups (risk difference 0.03, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.06; moderate quality of evidence), and among children taking different UDCA doses (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The available short-term evidence showed that UDCA was effective and safe for children with cholestasis. Clinicians should use UDCA with caution (start with a low dose) until the long-term effect is further explored in future larger RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9888709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98887092023-02-01 Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Liang Li, Siyu Chen, Jingjing Zhu, Yu Lan, Ke Zeng, Linan Jiang, Xuehua Zhang, Lingli PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the main therapeutic drug for cholestasis, but its use in children is controversial. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis. METHODS: We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from the establishment of databases to July 2022. Eligible studies included Chinese or English randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of no UDCA (placebo or blank control) and UDCA in children with cholestasis. This study had been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022354052). RESULTS: A total of 32 RCTs proved eligible, which included 2153 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that UDCA could improve symptoms of children with cholestasis (risk ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.29; moderate quality of evidence), and serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and total bile acid (low quality of evidence). For some children with specific cholestasis, UDCA could also effectively drop serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis) and γ-glutamyl transferase (infantile hepatitis syndrome, parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis). The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of UDCA in children were gastrointestinal adverse reactions, with an incidence of 10.63% (67/630). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ADRs between UDCA and placebo/blank control groups (risk difference 0.03, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.06; moderate quality of evidence), and among children taking different UDCA doses (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The available short-term evidence showed that UDCA was effective and safe for children with cholestasis. Clinicians should use UDCA with caution (start with a low dose) until the long-term effect is further explored in future larger RCTs. Public Library of Science 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9888709/ /pubmed/36719881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280691 Text en © 2023 Huang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Liang
Li, Siyu
Chen, Jingjing
Zhu, Yu
Lan, Ke
Zeng, Linan
Jiang, Xuehua
Zhang, Lingli
Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in children with cholestasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280691
work_keys_str_mv AT huangliang efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisiyu efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjingjing efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuyu efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanke efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zenglinan efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangxuehua efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglingli efficacyandsafetyofursodeoxycholicacidinchildrenwithcholestasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis