Cargando…

Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) tumors have similar clinicopathological features to Lynch syndrome (LS) tumors but have no identifiable pathogenic germline mismatch repair gene variant. However, cancer risks in LLS patients and first-degree relatives (FDRs) are not well defined. METHODS: To cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nugroho, Pandu P., Ghozali, Siti Alyaa S., Buchanan, Daniel D., Pisano, Mia I., Reece, Jeanette C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04397-0
_version_ 1784880723461668864
author Nugroho, Pandu P.
Ghozali, Siti Alyaa S.
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Pisano, Mia I.
Reece, Jeanette C.
author_facet Nugroho, Pandu P.
Ghozali, Siti Alyaa S.
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Pisano, Mia I.
Reece, Jeanette C.
author_sort Nugroho, Pandu P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) tumors have similar clinicopathological features to Lynch syndrome (LS) tumors but have no identifiable pathogenic germline mismatch repair gene variant. However, cancer risks in LLS patients and first-degree relatives (FDRs) are not well defined. METHODS: To clarify LLS-associated cancer risks, a systematic review of all studies examining all cancer risks in LLS was performed. Searching of Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane and CINAHL databases and reference/citation checking identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1980 and February 11, 2021. Joanna Briggs Institute Appraisal Tools assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: Six studies (five cohort/one cross-sectional) were eligible for study inclusion. One study found no difference in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence between LLS and LS patients or CRC risks at aged 70 years. Three studies found CRC incidence in LLS FDRs was higher than the general population but lower than LS FDRs. Two studies showed no difference in CRC diagnosis age between LLS patients and LS patients. Endometrial cancer risks in LLS patients were higher than the general population but lower than LS patients. CONCLUSION: Evidence of elevated CRC risks in LLS patients and FDRs supports increased colonoscopy surveillance strategies for LLS patients and FDRs in line with current recommendations for LS. Due to heterogeneity amongst LLS populations, extended intervals between screening may be advised for low-risk families. Studies to resolve the molecular characterization and definition of LLS are needed to clarify cancer risks associated with LLS which in turn may individualize surveillance strategies for LLS patients and families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04397-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98894102023-02-02 Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review Nugroho, Pandu P. Ghozali, Siti Alyaa S. Buchanan, Daniel D. Pisano, Mia I. Reece, Jeanette C. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) tumors have similar clinicopathological features to Lynch syndrome (LS) tumors but have no identifiable pathogenic germline mismatch repair gene variant. However, cancer risks in LLS patients and first-degree relatives (FDRs) are not well defined. METHODS: To clarify LLS-associated cancer risks, a systematic review of all studies examining all cancer risks in LLS was performed. Searching of Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane and CINAHL databases and reference/citation checking identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1980 and February 11, 2021. Joanna Briggs Institute Appraisal Tools assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: Six studies (five cohort/one cross-sectional) were eligible for study inclusion. One study found no difference in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence between LLS and LS patients or CRC risks at aged 70 years. Three studies found CRC incidence in LLS FDRs was higher than the general population but lower than LS FDRs. Two studies showed no difference in CRC diagnosis age between LLS patients and LS patients. Endometrial cancer risks in LLS patients were higher than the general population but lower than LS patients. CONCLUSION: Evidence of elevated CRC risks in LLS patients and FDRs supports increased colonoscopy surveillance strategies for LLS patients and FDRs in line with current recommendations for LS. Due to heterogeneity amongst LLS populations, extended intervals between screening may be advised for low-risk families. Studies to resolve the molecular characterization and definition of LLS are needed to clarify cancer risks associated with LLS which in turn may individualize surveillance strategies for LLS patients and families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04397-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9889410/ /pubmed/36251064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04397-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Nugroho, Pandu P.
Ghozali, Siti Alyaa S.
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Pisano, Mia I.
Reece, Jeanette C.
Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title_full Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title_short Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
title_sort risk of cancer in individuals with lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04397-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nugrohopandup riskofcancerinindividualswithlynchlikesyndromeandtheirfamiliesasystematicreview
AT ghozalisitialyaas riskofcancerinindividualswithlynchlikesyndromeandtheirfamiliesasystematicreview
AT buchanandanield riskofcancerinindividualswithlynchlikesyndromeandtheirfamiliesasystematicreview
AT pisanomiai riskofcancerinindividualswithlynchlikesyndromeandtheirfamiliesasystematicreview
AT reecejeanettec riskofcancerinindividualswithlynchlikesyndromeandtheirfamiliesasystematicreview