Cargando…

Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia

BACKGROUND: Since the discovery more than half a century ago, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become an attractive objective in multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring settings. However, despite the increasing number of cfDNA applications in liquid biopsies, we still lack a comprehensive understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitenc, Marie, Grebstad Tune, Benedicte, Melheim, Maria, Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica, Lai, Xiaoran, Rajar, Polona, Solberg, Rønnaug, Baumbusch, Lars Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0
_version_ 1784880730887684096
author Bitenc, Marie
Grebstad Tune, Benedicte
Melheim, Maria
Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica
Lai, Xiaoran
Rajar, Polona
Solberg, Rønnaug
Baumbusch, Lars Oliver
author_facet Bitenc, Marie
Grebstad Tune, Benedicte
Melheim, Maria
Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica
Lai, Xiaoran
Rajar, Polona
Solberg, Rønnaug
Baumbusch, Lars Oliver
author_sort Bitenc, Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the discovery more than half a century ago, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become an attractive objective in multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring settings. However, despite the increasing number of cfDNA applications in liquid biopsies, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the nature of cfDNA including optimal assessment. In the presented study, we continued testing and validation of common techniques for cfDNA extraction and quantification (qRT-PCR or droplet digital PCR) of nuclear- and mitochondrial cfDNA (ncfDNA and mtcfDNA) in blood, using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia to determine potential temporal and quantitative changes at the levels of cfDNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Newborn piglets (n = 19) were either exposed to hypoxia (n = 11) or were part of the sham-operated control group (n = 8). Blood samples were collected at baseline (= start) and at the end of hypoxia or at 40–45 min for the sham-operated control group. Applying the qRT-PCR method, ncfDNA concentrations in piglets exposed to hypoxia revealed an increasing trend from 7.1 ng/ml to 9.5 ng/ml for HK2 (hexokinase 2) and from 4.6 ng/ml to 7.9 ng/ml for β-globulin, respectively, whereas the control animals showed a more balanced profile. Furthermore, median levels of mtcfDNA were much higher in comparison to ncfDNA, but without significant differences between intervention versus the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both, qRT-PCR and the droplet digital PCR technique identified overall similar patterns for the concentration changes of cfDNA; but, the more sensitive digital PCR methodology might be required to identify minimal responses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98894412023-02-02 Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia Bitenc, Marie Grebstad Tune, Benedicte Melheim, Maria Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica Lai, Xiaoran Rajar, Polona Solberg, Rønnaug Baumbusch, Lars Oliver Mol Biol Rep Original Article BACKGROUND: Since the discovery more than half a century ago, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become an attractive objective in multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring settings. However, despite the increasing number of cfDNA applications in liquid biopsies, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the nature of cfDNA including optimal assessment. In the presented study, we continued testing and validation of common techniques for cfDNA extraction and quantification (qRT-PCR or droplet digital PCR) of nuclear- and mitochondrial cfDNA (ncfDNA and mtcfDNA) in blood, using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia to determine potential temporal and quantitative changes at the levels of cfDNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Newborn piglets (n = 19) were either exposed to hypoxia (n = 11) or were part of the sham-operated control group (n = 8). Blood samples were collected at baseline (= start) and at the end of hypoxia or at 40–45 min for the sham-operated control group. Applying the qRT-PCR method, ncfDNA concentrations in piglets exposed to hypoxia revealed an increasing trend from 7.1 ng/ml to 9.5 ng/ml for HK2 (hexokinase 2) and from 4.6 ng/ml to 7.9 ng/ml for β-globulin, respectively, whereas the control animals showed a more balanced profile. Furthermore, median levels of mtcfDNA were much higher in comparison to ncfDNA, but without significant differences between intervention versus the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both, qRT-PCR and the droplet digital PCR technique identified overall similar patterns for the concentration changes of cfDNA; but, the more sensitive digital PCR methodology might be required to identify minimal responses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0. Springer Netherlands 2022-12-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9889441/ /pubmed/36512170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bitenc, Marie
Grebstad Tune, Benedicte
Melheim, Maria
Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica
Lai, Xiaoran
Rajar, Polona
Solberg, Rønnaug
Baumbusch, Lars Oliver
Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title_full Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title_fullStr Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title_full_unstemmed Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title_short Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
title_sort assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free dna (cfdna) by qrt-pcr and droplet digital pcr using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36512170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bitencmarie assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT grebstadtunebenedicte assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT melheimmaria assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT atneosenaseggmonica assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT laixiaoran assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT rajarpolona assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT solbergrønnaug assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia
AT baumbuschlarsoliver assessingnuclearversusmitochondrialcellfreednacfdnabyqrtpcranddropletdigitalpcrusingapigletmodelofperinatalasphyxia