Cargando…

A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery

PURPOSE: Meningioma is a common type of benign tumor that can be managed in several ways, ranging from close observation, surgical resection, and various types of radiation. We present here results from a 10 year experience treating meningiomas with a hypofractionated approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gawish, Ahmed, Abdulayev, Nurlan, El-Arayed, Souhir, Röllich, Burkard, Ochel, Hans-Joachim, Brunner, Thomas B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04450-y
_version_ 1784880740343742464
author Gawish, Ahmed
Abdulayev, Nurlan
El-Arayed, Souhir
Röllich, Burkard
Ochel, Hans-Joachim
Brunner, Thomas B.
author_facet Gawish, Ahmed
Abdulayev, Nurlan
El-Arayed, Souhir
Röllich, Burkard
Ochel, Hans-Joachim
Brunner, Thomas B.
author_sort Gawish, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Meningioma is a common type of benign tumor that can be managed in several ways, ranging from close observation, surgical resection, and various types of radiation. We present here results from a 10 year experience treating meningiomas with a hypofractionated approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define the rate of tumor control and factors associated with the relief of symptoms and radiation-related complications after radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiosurgery for patients with imaging-defined intracranial meningiomas. We reviewed the charts of 48 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) from 2002 to 2018. A total of 37 (82%) patients had WHO Grade 1 disease, and 11 (22%) had Grade 2. Outcomes that were analyzed included local control rates and the rate and grade of any reported toxicity. RESULTS: Only 36 patients with 38 lesions, who underwent the follow-up regime, were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. The follow-up mean was 40 months (12–120 months). 25/34 patients had surgery before the radiotherapy. Sixteen underwent SRS with a median dose of 13, 5, and 20 received hypofractionated SBRT with a median dose of 26.9 (22-45 Gy) in median six fractions (5–13 fractions). Local control at 2 and 5 years for all patients was 90 and 70%, respectively. No patient suffered from toxicity > 2 CTC. 21/36 patients showed stable disease, while 8/36 patients showed partial Remission. 7/36 developed recurrent meningioma (five in-field), only one patient with grade 1 meningioma, in a median of 22 months (13–48 months). CONCLUSION: SFRT was superior to SRS for local control in our analysis of Grade I meningiomas. This might be due to a tendency for higher EQD2 in the PTV with SFRT compared to SRS, which was reduced to avoid brain necrosis in large PTVs. Therefore, SFRT appears preferable for typical meningioma PTVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98894792023-02-02 A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery Gawish, Ahmed Abdulayev, Nurlan El-Arayed, Souhir Röllich, Burkard Ochel, Hans-Joachim Brunner, Thomas B. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Meningioma is a common type of benign tumor that can be managed in several ways, ranging from close observation, surgical resection, and various types of radiation. We present here results from a 10 year experience treating meningiomas with a hypofractionated approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define the rate of tumor control and factors associated with the relief of symptoms and radiation-related complications after radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiosurgery for patients with imaging-defined intracranial meningiomas. We reviewed the charts of 48 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) from 2002 to 2018. A total of 37 (82%) patients had WHO Grade 1 disease, and 11 (22%) had Grade 2. Outcomes that were analyzed included local control rates and the rate and grade of any reported toxicity. RESULTS: Only 36 patients with 38 lesions, who underwent the follow-up regime, were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. The follow-up mean was 40 months (12–120 months). 25/34 patients had surgery before the radiotherapy. Sixteen underwent SRS with a median dose of 13, 5, and 20 received hypofractionated SBRT with a median dose of 26.9 (22-45 Gy) in median six fractions (5–13 fractions). Local control at 2 and 5 years for all patients was 90 and 70%, respectively. No patient suffered from toxicity > 2 CTC. 21/36 patients showed stable disease, while 8/36 patients showed partial Remission. 7/36 developed recurrent meningioma (five in-field), only one patient with grade 1 meningioma, in a median of 22 months (13–48 months). CONCLUSION: SFRT was superior to SRS for local control in our analysis of Grade I meningiomas. This might be due to a tendency for higher EQD2 in the PTV with SFRT compared to SRS, which was reduced to avoid brain necrosis in large PTVs. Therefore, SFRT appears preferable for typical meningioma PTVs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9889479/ /pubmed/36307558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04450-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gawish, Ahmed
Abdulayev, Nurlan
El-Arayed, Souhir
Röllich, Burkard
Ochel, Hans-Joachim
Brunner, Thomas B.
A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title_full A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title_fullStr A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title_short A single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
title_sort single-center experience with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas: hypofractionation and radiosurgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04450-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gawishahmed asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT abdulayevnurlan asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT elarayedsouhir asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT rollichburkard asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT ochelhansjoachim asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT brunnerthomasb asinglecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT gawishahmed singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT abdulayevnurlan singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT elarayedsouhir singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT rollichburkard singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT ochelhansjoachim singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery
AT brunnerthomasb singlecenterexperiencewithlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiotherapyformeningiomashypofractionationandradiosurgery