Cargando…
Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9 |
_version_ | 1784880762165657600 |
---|---|
author | Dietz, Matthieu Dunet, Vincent Mantziari, Styliani Pomoni, Anastasia Dias Correia, Ricardo Testart Dardel, Nathalie Boughdad, Sarah Nicod Lalonde, Marie Treglia, Giorgio Schafer, Markus Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. |
author_facet | Dietz, Matthieu Dunet, Vincent Mantziari, Styliani Pomoni, Anastasia Dias Correia, Ricardo Testart Dardel, Nathalie Boughdad, Sarah Nicod Lalonde, Marie Treglia, Giorgio Schafer, Markus Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. |
author_sort | Dietz, Matthieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten (18)F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40–69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used. RESULTS: (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG was significantly higher than those of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7–11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6–4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV(max) in an osseous metastasis with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to (18)F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV(max), ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that (18)F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to (18)F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α(v)β(3) expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation. Trial registration: Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9889587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98895872023-02-02 Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers Dietz, Matthieu Dunet, Vincent Mantziari, Styliani Pomoni, Anastasia Dias Correia, Ricardo Testart Dardel, Nathalie Boughdad, Sarah Nicod Lalonde, Marie Treglia, Giorgio Schafer, Markus Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten (18)F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40–69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used. RESULTS: (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG was significantly higher than those of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7–11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6–4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV(max) in an osseous metastasis with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to (18)F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV(max), ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that (18)F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to (18)F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α(v)β(3) expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation. Trial registration: Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9889587/ /pubmed/36720731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dietz, Matthieu Dunet, Vincent Mantziari, Styliani Pomoni, Anastasia Dias Correia, Ricardo Testart Dardel, Nathalie Boughdad, Sarah Nicod Lalonde, Marie Treglia, Giorgio Schafer, Markus Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title | Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title_full | Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title_short | Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
title_sort | comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)ga-nodaga-rgd pet/ct and glucose metabolism with (18)f-fdg pet/ct in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietzmatthieu comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT dunetvincent comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT mantziaristyliani comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT pomonianastasia comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT diascorreiaricardo comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT testartdardelnathalie comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT boughdadsarah comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT nicodlalondemarie comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT tregliagiorgio comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT schafermarkus comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT schaeferniklaus comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers AT priorjohno comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers |