Cargando…

Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers

BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietz, Matthieu, Dunet, Vincent, Mantziari, Styliani, Pomoni, Anastasia, Dias Correia, Ricardo, Testart Dardel, Nathalie, Boughdad, Sarah, Nicod Lalonde, Marie, Treglia, Giorgio, Schafer, Markus, Schaefer, Niklaus, Prior, John O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9
_version_ 1784880762165657600
author Dietz, Matthieu
Dunet, Vincent
Mantziari, Styliani
Pomoni, Anastasia
Dias Correia, Ricardo
Testart Dardel, Nathalie
Boughdad, Sarah
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Treglia, Giorgio
Schafer, Markus
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
author_facet Dietz, Matthieu
Dunet, Vincent
Mantziari, Styliani
Pomoni, Anastasia
Dias Correia, Ricardo
Testart Dardel, Nathalie
Boughdad, Sarah
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Treglia, Giorgio
Schafer, Markus
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
author_sort Dietz, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten (18)F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40–69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used. RESULTS: (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG was significantly higher than those of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7–11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6–4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV(max) in an osseous metastasis with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to (18)F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV(max), ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that (18)F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to (18)F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α(v)β(3) expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation. Trial registration: Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98895872023-02-02 Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers Dietz, Matthieu Dunet, Vincent Mantziari, Styliani Pomoni, Anastasia Dias Correia, Ricardo Testart Dardel, Nathalie Boughdad, Sarah Nicod Lalonde, Marie Treglia, Giorgio Schafer, Markus Schaefer, Niklaus Prior, John O. Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination. METHODS: Ten (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten (18)F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40–69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used. RESULTS: (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG was significantly higher than those of (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7–11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6–4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV(max) in an osseous metastasis with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to (18)F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV(max), ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that (18)F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to (18)F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α(v)β(3) expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation. Trial registration: Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9889587/ /pubmed/36720731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dietz, Matthieu
Dunet, Vincent
Mantziari, Styliani
Pomoni, Anastasia
Dias Correia, Ricardo
Testart Dardel, Nathalie
Boughdad, Sarah
Nicod Lalonde, Marie
Treglia, Giorgio
Schafer, Markus
Schaefer, Niklaus
Prior, John O.
Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title_full Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title_fullStr Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title_short Comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
title_sort comparison of integrin α(v)β(3) expression with (68)ga-nodaga-rgd pet/ct and glucose metabolism with (18)f-fdg pet/ct in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dietzmatthieu comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT dunetvincent comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT mantziaristyliani comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT pomonianastasia comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT diascorreiaricardo comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT testartdardelnathalie comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT boughdadsarah comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT nicodlalondemarie comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT tregliagiorgio comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT schafermarkus comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT schaeferniklaus comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers
AT priorjohno comparisonofintegrinavb3expressionwith68ganodagargdpetctandglucosemetabolismwith18ffdgpetctinesophagealorgastroesophagealjunctioncancers