Cargando…

Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared. METHODS: This pilot study was based on a screening program conducted fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xiaoxi, Qiu, Youhui, Bao, Fangfang, Wang, Juanhua, Lin, Caifeng, Lin, Yan, Wu, Jianhang, Yang, Haomin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639
_version_ 1784880774829309952
author Huang, Xiaoxi
Qiu, Youhui
Bao, Fangfang
Wang, Juanhua
Lin, Caifeng
Lin, Yan
Wu, Jianhang
Yang, Haomin
author_facet Huang, Xiaoxi
Qiu, Youhui
Bao, Fangfang
Wang, Juanhua
Lin, Caifeng
Lin, Yan
Wu, Jianhang
Yang, Haomin
author_sort Huang, Xiaoxi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared. METHODS: This pilot study was based on a screening program conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in southeast China. All the participants who received both HHUS and AIBUS were included in the study (N = 344). The ultrasound videos after AIBUS scanning were independently watched by a senior radiologist and a junior radiologist. Agreement rate and weighted Kappa value were used to compare their results in BI-RADS categorization with HHUS. RESULTS: The detection rate of breast nodules by HHUS was 14.83%, while the detection rates were 34.01% for AIBUS videos watched by a senior radiologist and 35.76% when watched by a junior radiologist. After AIBUS scanning, the weighted Kappa value for BI-RADS categorization between videos watched by senior radiologists and HHUS was 0.497 (p < 0.001) with an agreement rate of 78.8%, indicating its potential use in breast cancer screening. However, the Kappa value of AIBUS videos watched by junior radiologist was 0.39, when comparing to HHUS. CONCLUSION: AIBUS breast scan can obtain relatively clear images and detect more breast nodules. The results of AIBUS scanning watched by senior radiologists are moderately consistent with HHUS and might be used in screening practice, especially in primary health care with limited numbers of radiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98896432023-02-02 Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program Huang, Xiaoxi Qiu, Youhui Bao, Fangfang Wang, Juanhua Lin, Caifeng Lin, Yan Wu, Jianhang Yang, Haomin Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared. METHODS: This pilot study was based on a screening program conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in southeast China. All the participants who received both HHUS and AIBUS were included in the study (N = 344). The ultrasound videos after AIBUS scanning were independently watched by a senior radiologist and a junior radiologist. Agreement rate and weighted Kappa value were used to compare their results in BI-RADS categorization with HHUS. RESULTS: The detection rate of breast nodules by HHUS was 14.83%, while the detection rates were 34.01% for AIBUS videos watched by a senior radiologist and 35.76% when watched by a junior radiologist. After AIBUS scanning, the weighted Kappa value for BI-RADS categorization between videos watched by senior radiologists and HHUS was 0.497 (p < 0.001) with an agreement rate of 78.8%, indicating its potential use in breast cancer screening. However, the Kappa value of AIBUS videos watched by junior radiologist was 0.39, when comparing to HHUS. CONCLUSION: AIBUS breast scan can obtain relatively clear images and detect more breast nodules. The results of AIBUS scanning watched by senior radiologists are moderately consistent with HHUS and might be used in screening practice, especially in primary health care with limited numbers of radiologists. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9889643/ /pubmed/36743185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang, Qiu, Bao, Wang, Lin, Lin, Wu and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Huang, Xiaoxi
Qiu, Youhui
Bao, Fangfang
Wang, Juanhua
Lin, Caifeng
Lin, Yan
Wu, Jianhang
Yang, Haomin
Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title_full Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title_short Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
title_sort artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the bi-rads categorization of breast lesions: a pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxiaoxi artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT qiuyouhui artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT baofangfang artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT wangjuanhua artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT lincaifeng artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT linyan artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT wujianhang artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram
AT yanghaomin artificialintelligencebreastultrasoundandhandheldultrasoundinthebiradscategorizationofbreastlesionsapilotheadtoheadcomparisonstudyinscreeningprogram