Cargando…

Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy with increasing incidence in developed countries. As gold standard, hysteroscopy confirms only 30% of suspected ECs. The detection of EC cells in the vagina by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after a smear test could redu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weimer, Jörg, Hüttmann, Martje, Nusilati, Asiyan, Andreas, Svenja, Röseler, Jona, Tribian, Nils, Rogmans, Christoph, Stope, Matthias Bernhard, Dahl, Edgar, Mustea, Alexander, Stickeler, Elmar, Hedemann, Nina, Flörkemeier, Inken, Tiemann, Katharina, Magadeeva, Svetlana, Dempfle, Astrid, Arnold, Norbert, Maass, Nicolai, Bauerschlag, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36625073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17658
_version_ 1784880789778857984
author Weimer, Jörg
Hüttmann, Martje
Nusilati, Asiyan
Andreas, Svenja
Röseler, Jona
Tribian, Nils
Rogmans, Christoph
Stope, Matthias Bernhard
Dahl, Edgar
Mustea, Alexander
Stickeler, Elmar
Hedemann, Nina
Flörkemeier, Inken
Tiemann, Katharina
Magadeeva, Svetlana
Dempfle, Astrid
Arnold, Norbert
Maass, Nicolai
Bauerschlag, Dirk
author_facet Weimer, Jörg
Hüttmann, Martje
Nusilati, Asiyan
Andreas, Svenja
Röseler, Jona
Tribian, Nils
Rogmans, Christoph
Stope, Matthias Bernhard
Dahl, Edgar
Mustea, Alexander
Stickeler, Elmar
Hedemann, Nina
Flörkemeier, Inken
Tiemann, Katharina
Magadeeva, Svetlana
Dempfle, Astrid
Arnold, Norbert
Maass, Nicolai
Bauerschlag, Dirk
author_sort Weimer, Jörg
collection PubMed
description Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy with increasing incidence in developed countries. As gold standard, hysteroscopy confirms only 30% of suspected ECs. The detection of EC cells in the vagina by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after a smear test could reduce invasive procedures in the future. Using array‐based comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) on 65 endometrial carcinomas, most frequently imbalanced regions of the tumour genome were identified. Bacterial artificial chromosomes were used to generate FISH‐probes homologue to these human regions. The FISH test was hybridized on swabs specimens collected from the vaginal cavity. Samples from six patients without EC were selected as a negative control and on 13 patients with known EC as a positive control. To distinguish between benign and EC cases, the cut‐off value has been defined. A first validation of this EC‐FISH Test was performed with swabs from 41 patients with suspected EC. The most common genomic imbalances in EC are around the CTNNB1, FBXW7 and APC genes. The cut‐off is defined at 32% of analysed cells without diploid signal pattern. This differs significantly between the positive and negative controls (p < 0.001). In a first validation cohort of 41 patients with suspected EC, the EC‐FISH Test distinguishes patients with and without EC with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 83%. The negative predictive value is 96%. This is the first report of a non‐invasive EC‐FISH Test to predict EC in women with suspected EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9889703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98897032023-02-02 Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab Weimer, Jörg Hüttmann, Martje Nusilati, Asiyan Andreas, Svenja Röseler, Jona Tribian, Nils Rogmans, Christoph Stope, Matthias Bernhard Dahl, Edgar Mustea, Alexander Stickeler, Elmar Hedemann, Nina Flörkemeier, Inken Tiemann, Katharina Magadeeva, Svetlana Dempfle, Astrid Arnold, Norbert Maass, Nicolai Bauerschlag, Dirk J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy with increasing incidence in developed countries. As gold standard, hysteroscopy confirms only 30% of suspected ECs. The detection of EC cells in the vagina by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after a smear test could reduce invasive procedures in the future. Using array‐based comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) on 65 endometrial carcinomas, most frequently imbalanced regions of the tumour genome were identified. Bacterial artificial chromosomes were used to generate FISH‐probes homologue to these human regions. The FISH test was hybridized on swabs specimens collected from the vaginal cavity. Samples from six patients without EC were selected as a negative control and on 13 patients with known EC as a positive control. To distinguish between benign and EC cases, the cut‐off value has been defined. A first validation of this EC‐FISH Test was performed with swabs from 41 patients with suspected EC. The most common genomic imbalances in EC are around the CTNNB1, FBXW7 and APC genes. The cut‐off is defined at 32% of analysed cells without diploid signal pattern. This differs significantly between the positive and negative controls (p < 0.001). In a first validation cohort of 41 patients with suspected EC, the EC‐FISH Test distinguishes patients with and without EC with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 83%. The negative predictive value is 96%. This is the first report of a non‐invasive EC‐FISH Test to predict EC in women with suspected EC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9889703/ /pubmed/36625073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17658 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Weimer, Jörg
Hüttmann, Martje
Nusilati, Asiyan
Andreas, Svenja
Röseler, Jona
Tribian, Nils
Rogmans, Christoph
Stope, Matthias Bernhard
Dahl, Edgar
Mustea, Alexander
Stickeler, Elmar
Hedemann, Nina
Flörkemeier, Inken
Tiemann, Katharina
Magadeeva, Svetlana
Dempfle, Astrid
Arnold, Norbert
Maass, Nicolai
Bauerschlag, Dirk
Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title_full Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title_fullStr Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title_full_unstemmed Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title_short Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
title_sort fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non‐invasive vaginal swab
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36625073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17658
work_keys_str_mv AT weimerjorg fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT huttmannmartje fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT nusilatiasiyan fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT andreassvenja fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT roselerjona fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT tribiannils fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT rogmanschristoph fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT stopematthiasbernhard fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT dahledgar fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT musteaalexander fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT stickelerelmar fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT hedemannnina fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT florkemeierinken fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT tiemannkatharina fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT magadeevasvetlana fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT dempfleastrid fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT arnoldnorbert fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT maassnicolai fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab
AT bauerschlagdirk fluorescenceinsituhybridizationtestfordetectionofendometrialcarcinomacellsbynoninvasivevaginalswab