Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical characteristics of various tissue structures of different sizes of 3D printed Cage in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: A finite element model of normal spine was reconstructed and verified. Pedicle screws and Cage of different sizes were implanted in the L4/5 s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jincheng, Feng, Qing, Yang, Dongmei, Xu, Hanpeng, Wen, Wangqiang, Xu, Haoxiang, Miao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06201-7
_version_ 1784880993161707520
author Wu, Jincheng
Feng, Qing
Yang, Dongmei
Xu, Hanpeng
Wen, Wangqiang
Xu, Haoxiang
Miao, Jun
author_facet Wu, Jincheng
Feng, Qing
Yang, Dongmei
Xu, Hanpeng
Wen, Wangqiang
Xu, Haoxiang
Miao, Jun
author_sort Wu, Jincheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical characteristics of various tissue structures of different sizes of 3D printed Cage in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: A finite element model of normal spine was reconstructed and verified. Pedicle screws and Cage of different sizes were implanted in the L4/5 segment to simulate lumbar interbody fusion. The range of motion of the fixed and cephalic adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, the stress at the interface between cage and L5 endplate, and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment of each postoperative model were larger than those of the intact model, but there was not much difference between them. The stress of cage-endplate interface was also larger than that of the intact model. However, the difference is that the stress of the endplate and the screw-rod system has a tendency to decrease with the increase of the axial area of cage. CONCLUSIONS: Cage with larger axial area in lumbar interbody fusion can reduce the stress of internal fixation system and endplate, but will not increase the range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of adjacent segment. It has a certain effect in preventing the cage subsidence, internal fixation system failure and screw rod fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9890703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98907032023-02-02 Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis Wu, Jincheng Feng, Qing Yang, Dongmei Xu, Hanpeng Wen, Wangqiang Xu, Haoxiang Miao, Jun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical characteristics of various tissue structures of different sizes of 3D printed Cage in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: A finite element model of normal spine was reconstructed and verified. Pedicle screws and Cage of different sizes were implanted in the L4/5 segment to simulate lumbar interbody fusion. The range of motion of the fixed and cephalic adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, the stress at the interface between cage and L5 endplate, and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment of each postoperative model were larger than those of the intact model, but there was not much difference between them. The stress of cage-endplate interface was also larger than that of the intact model. However, the difference is that the stress of the endplate and the screw-rod system has a tendency to decrease with the increase of the axial area of cage. CONCLUSIONS: Cage with larger axial area in lumbar interbody fusion can reduce the stress of internal fixation system and endplate, but will not increase the range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of adjacent segment. It has a certain effect in preventing the cage subsidence, internal fixation system failure and screw rod fracture. BioMed Central 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9890703/ /pubmed/36726086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06201-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Jincheng
Feng, Qing
Yang, Dongmei
Xu, Hanpeng
Wen, Wangqiang
Xu, Haoxiang
Miao, Jun
Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3d printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06201-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wujincheng biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT fengqing biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT yangdongmei biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT xuhanpeng biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT wenwangqiang biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT xuhaoxiang biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT miaojun biomechanicalevaluationofdifferentsizesof3dprintedcageinlumbarinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis