Cargando…
Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe
BACKGROUND: Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scien...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x |
_version_ | 1784880998388858880 |
---|---|
author | Humboldt-Dachroeden, Sarah |
author_facet | Humboldt-Dachroeden, Sarah |
author_sort | Humboldt-Dachroeden, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers. METHODS: An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts’ perceptions. RESULTS: This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers. Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics. It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.g. antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.g. environmental issues). Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies. National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences. Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach. CONCLUSION: The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets. This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers. Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers. Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9890731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98907312023-02-02 Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe Humboldt-Dachroeden, Sarah One Health Outlook Research BACKGROUND: Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers. METHODS: An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts’ perceptions. RESULTS: This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers. Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics. It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.g. antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.g. environmental issues). Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies. National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences. Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach. CONCLUSION: The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets. This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers. Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers. Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x. BioMed Central 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9890731/ /pubmed/36721252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Humboldt-Dachroeden, Sarah Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title | Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title_full | Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title_fullStr | Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title_short | Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe |
title_sort | translating one health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in europe |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT humboldtdachroedensarah translatingonehealthknowledgeacrossdifferentinstitutionalandpoliticalcontextsineurope |