Cargando…

Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication following loop ileostomy reversal. Incisional hernias are associated with morbidity, loss of health-related quality of life and costs and warrant the investigation of prophylactic measures. Prophylactic mesh implantation at the time of surgica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Sven, Weyhe, Dirk, Herrle, Florian, Horvath, Philipp, Bachmann, Robert, von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Viktor, Heger, Patrick, Nasir, Nadir, Klose, Christina, Ritz, Alexander, Sander, Anja, Grohmann, Erich, Dörr-Harim, Colette, Mihaljevic, André L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3
_version_ 1784881006644297728
author Müller, Sven
Weyhe, Dirk
Herrle, Florian
Horvath, Philipp
Bachmann, Robert
von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Viktor
Heger, Patrick
Nasir, Nadir
Klose, Christina
Ritz, Alexander
Sander, Anja
Grohmann, Erich
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_facet Müller, Sven
Weyhe, Dirk
Herrle, Florian
Horvath, Philipp
Bachmann, Robert
von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Viktor
Heger, Patrick
Nasir, Nadir
Klose, Christina
Ritz, Alexander
Sander, Anja
Grohmann, Erich
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_sort Müller, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication following loop ileostomy reversal. Incisional hernias are associated with morbidity, loss of health-related quality of life and costs and warrant the investigation of prophylactic measures. Prophylactic mesh implantation at the time of surgical stoma reversal has shown to be a promising and safe method to prevent incisional hernias in this setting. However, the efficacy of this method has not yet been investigated in a large multicentre randomised-controlled trial (RCT) with adequate external validity. The P.E.L.I.O.N. trial will evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic mesh reinforcement after loop ileostomy closure in decreasing the rate of incisional hernia versus standard closure alone. METHODS: P.E.L.I.O.N. is a multicentre, patient- and observer-blind RCT. Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure will undergo intraoperative 1:1 randomisation into either abdominal wall closure with a continuous slowly absorbable suture in small-stitch technique without mesh reinforcement (control group) or abdominal wall closure with an additional reinforcement with a retromuscular non-absorbable, macro-pore (pore size ≥ 1000 μm or effective porosity >0%) light-weight monofilament or mixed structure mesh. A total of 304 patients (152 per group) will need to be randomised in the study. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,014 patients are expected to be screened for eligibility in order to recruit the necessary number of patients. The primary endpoint will be the frequency of incision hernias within 24 months according to the European Hernia Society definition. Secondary endpoints will be the frequency of surgical site occurrences (including surgical site infections, wound seromas and hematomas, and enterocutaneous fistulas), postoperative pain, the number of revision surgeries and health-related quality of life. Safety will be assessed by measuring postoperative complications ≥ grade 3 according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. DISCUSSION: Depending on the results of the P.E.L.I.O.N. trial, prophylactic mesh implantation could become the new standard for loop ileostomy reversal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00027921, U1111-1273-4657 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9890770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98907702023-02-02 Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial) Müller, Sven Weyhe, Dirk Herrle, Florian Horvath, Philipp Bachmann, Robert von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Viktor Heger, Patrick Nasir, Nadir Klose, Christina Ritz, Alexander Sander, Anja Grohmann, Erich Dörr-Harim, Colette Mihaljevic, André L. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication following loop ileostomy reversal. Incisional hernias are associated with morbidity, loss of health-related quality of life and costs and warrant the investigation of prophylactic measures. Prophylactic mesh implantation at the time of surgical stoma reversal has shown to be a promising and safe method to prevent incisional hernias in this setting. However, the efficacy of this method has not yet been investigated in a large multicentre randomised-controlled trial (RCT) with adequate external validity. The P.E.L.I.O.N. trial will evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic mesh reinforcement after loop ileostomy closure in decreasing the rate of incisional hernia versus standard closure alone. METHODS: P.E.L.I.O.N. is a multicentre, patient- and observer-blind RCT. Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure will undergo intraoperative 1:1 randomisation into either abdominal wall closure with a continuous slowly absorbable suture in small-stitch technique without mesh reinforcement (control group) or abdominal wall closure with an additional reinforcement with a retromuscular non-absorbable, macro-pore (pore size ≥ 1000 μm or effective porosity >0%) light-weight monofilament or mixed structure mesh. A total of 304 patients (152 per group) will need to be randomised in the study. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,014 patients are expected to be screened for eligibility in order to recruit the necessary number of patients. The primary endpoint will be the frequency of incision hernias within 24 months according to the European Hernia Society definition. Secondary endpoints will be the frequency of surgical site occurrences (including surgical site infections, wound seromas and hematomas, and enterocutaneous fistulas), postoperative pain, the number of revision surgeries and health-related quality of life. Safety will be assessed by measuring postoperative complications ≥ grade 3 according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. DISCUSSION: Depending on the results of the P.E.L.I.O.N. trial, prophylactic mesh implantation could become the new standard for loop ileostomy reversal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00027921, U1111-1273-4657 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3. BioMed Central 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9890770/ /pubmed/36726155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Müller, Sven
Weyhe, Dirk
Herrle, Florian
Horvath, Philipp
Bachmann, Robert
von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Viktor
Heger, Patrick
Nasir, Nadir
Klose, Christina
Ritz, Alexander
Sander, Anja
Grohmann, Erich
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Mihaljevic, André L.
Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title_full Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title_fullStr Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title_short Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
title_sort prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (p.e.l.i.o.n trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36726155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mullersven prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT weyhedirk prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT herrleflorian prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT horvathphilipp prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT bachmannrobert prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT vonehrlichtreuenstattviktor prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT hegerpatrick prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT nasirnadir prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT klosechristina prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT ritzalexander prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT sanderanja prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT grohmannerich prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT dorrharimcolette prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial
AT mihaljevicandrel prophylacticeffectofretromuscularmeshplacementduringloopileostomyclosureonincisionalherniaincidenceamulticentrerandomisedpatientandobserverblindtrialpeliontrial