Cargando…
Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting
BACKGROUND: The TROIKA trial established that HD201 and trastuzumab were equivalent in terms of primary endpoints (total pathological complete response) following neoadjuvant treatment. The objective of the present analysis was to compare survival outcomes and final safety. METHODS: In the TROIKA tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10574-2 |
_version_ | 1784881017295732736 |
---|---|
author | Pivot, Xavier Manikhas, Alexey Georgievitch Shamrai, Volodymyr Dzagnidze, Giorgi Soo Hoo, Hwoei Fen Kaewkangsadan, Viriya Petrelli, Fausto Villanueva, Cristian Kim, Jamie Pradhan, Sumita Jaison, Litha Feyaerts, Peggy Kaufman, Leonard Derde, Marie-Paule Deforce, Filip Cox, David G. |
author_facet | Pivot, Xavier Manikhas, Alexey Georgievitch Shamrai, Volodymyr Dzagnidze, Giorgi Soo Hoo, Hwoei Fen Kaewkangsadan, Viriya Petrelli, Fausto Villanueva, Cristian Kim, Jamie Pradhan, Sumita Jaison, Litha Feyaerts, Peggy Kaufman, Leonard Derde, Marie-Paule Deforce, Filip Cox, David G. |
author_sort | Pivot, Xavier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The TROIKA trial established that HD201 and trastuzumab were equivalent in terms of primary endpoints (total pathological complete response) following neoadjuvant treatment. The objective of the present analysis was to compare survival outcomes and final safety. METHODS: In the TROIKA trial, patients with ERBB2-positive early breast cancer were randomized and treated with either HD201 or the referent trastuzumab. Eligible patients received 8 cycles of either HD201 or referent trastuzumab (loading dose, 8 mg/kg; maintenance dose, 6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks in combination with 8 cycles of chemotherapy (4 cycles of docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2), followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin, 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m(2)) in the neoadjuvant setting. The patients then underwent surgery followed by 10 cycles of adjuvant HD201 or referent trastuzumab according to their initial randomization to complete one year of trastuzumab-directed therapy. Event-free and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The hazard ratio for event-free survival was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed after all patients completed the study at a median follow-up of 37.7 months (Q1-Q3, 37.3–38.1 months). A total of 502 randomized patients received either HD201 or the referent trastuzumab, and 474 (94.2%) were eligible for inclusion in the per-protocol set. In this population, the 3-year event-free survival rates were 85.6% (95% CI: 80.28–89.52) and 84.9% (95% CI: 79.54–88.88) in the HD201 and referent trastuzumab groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.938) (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.63–1.63; p = 0.945). The 3-year overall survival rates were comparable between the HD201 (95.6%; 95% CI: 91.90–97.59) and referent trastuzumab treatment groups (96.0%, 95% CI: 92.45–97.90) (log rank p = 0.606). During the posttreatment follow-up period, adverse events were reported for 64 (27.4%) and 72 (29.8%) patients in the HD201 and the reference trastuzumab groups, respectively. Serious adverse events were rare and none of which were related to the study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This final analysis of the TROIKA trial further confirms the comparable efficacy and safety of HD201 and trastuzumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03013504. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9890819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98908192023-02-02 Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting Pivot, Xavier Manikhas, Alexey Georgievitch Shamrai, Volodymyr Dzagnidze, Giorgi Soo Hoo, Hwoei Fen Kaewkangsadan, Viriya Petrelli, Fausto Villanueva, Cristian Kim, Jamie Pradhan, Sumita Jaison, Litha Feyaerts, Peggy Kaufman, Leonard Derde, Marie-Paule Deforce, Filip Cox, David G. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The TROIKA trial established that HD201 and trastuzumab were equivalent in terms of primary endpoints (total pathological complete response) following neoadjuvant treatment. The objective of the present analysis was to compare survival outcomes and final safety. METHODS: In the TROIKA trial, patients with ERBB2-positive early breast cancer were randomized and treated with either HD201 or the referent trastuzumab. Eligible patients received 8 cycles of either HD201 or referent trastuzumab (loading dose, 8 mg/kg; maintenance dose, 6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks in combination with 8 cycles of chemotherapy (4 cycles of docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2), followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin, 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m(2)) in the neoadjuvant setting. The patients then underwent surgery followed by 10 cycles of adjuvant HD201 or referent trastuzumab according to their initial randomization to complete one year of trastuzumab-directed therapy. Event-free and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The hazard ratio for event-free survival was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed after all patients completed the study at a median follow-up of 37.7 months (Q1-Q3, 37.3–38.1 months). A total of 502 randomized patients received either HD201 or the referent trastuzumab, and 474 (94.2%) were eligible for inclusion in the per-protocol set. In this population, the 3-year event-free survival rates were 85.6% (95% CI: 80.28–89.52) and 84.9% (95% CI: 79.54–88.88) in the HD201 and referent trastuzumab groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.938) (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.63–1.63; p = 0.945). The 3-year overall survival rates were comparable between the HD201 (95.6%; 95% CI: 91.90–97.59) and referent trastuzumab treatment groups (96.0%, 95% CI: 92.45–97.90) (log rank p = 0.606). During the posttreatment follow-up period, adverse events were reported for 64 (27.4%) and 72 (29.8%) patients in the HD201 and the reference trastuzumab groups, respectively. Serious adverse events were rare and none of which were related to the study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This final analysis of the TROIKA trial further confirms the comparable efficacy and safety of HD201 and trastuzumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03013504. BioMed Central 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9890819/ /pubmed/36721174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10574-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pivot, Xavier Manikhas, Alexey Georgievitch Shamrai, Volodymyr Dzagnidze, Giorgi Soo Hoo, Hwoei Fen Kaewkangsadan, Viriya Petrelli, Fausto Villanueva, Cristian Kim, Jamie Pradhan, Sumita Jaison, Litha Feyaerts, Peggy Kaufman, Leonard Derde, Marie-Paule Deforce, Filip Cox, David G. Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title | Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title_full | Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title_fullStr | Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title_short | Final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing HD201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
title_sort | final analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing hd201 vs. referent trastuzumab in patients with erbb2-positive breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10574-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pivotxavier finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT manikhasalexeygeorgievitch finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT shamraivolodymyr finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT dzagnidzegiorgi finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT soohoohwoeifen finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT kaewkangsadanviriya finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT petrellifausto finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT villanuevacristian finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT kimjamie finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT pradhansumita finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT jaisonlitha finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT feyaertspeggy finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT kaufmanleonard finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT derdemariepaule finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT deforcefilip finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting AT coxdavidg finalanalysisofthephase3randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghd201vsreferenttrastuzumabinpatientswitherbb2positivebreastcancertreatedintheneoadjuvantsetting |