Cargando…

The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics

To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. BACKGROUND: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayazi, Shahin, Schwameis, Katrin, Zheng, Ping, Newhams, Kirsten, Myers, Brittney M., Grubic, Andrew D., Hoppo, Toshitaka, Jobe, Blair A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005239
_version_ 1784881105209393152
author Ayazi, Shahin
Schwameis, Katrin
Zheng, Ping
Newhams, Kirsten
Myers, Brittney M.
Grubic, Andrew D.
Hoppo, Toshitaka
Jobe, Blair A.
author_facet Ayazi, Shahin
Schwameis, Katrin
Zheng, Ping
Newhams, Kirsten
Myers, Brittney M.
Grubic, Andrew D.
Hoppo, Toshitaka
Jobe, Blair A.
author_sort Ayazi, Shahin
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. BACKGROUND: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. METHODS: Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged (P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9891265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98912652023-02-07 The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics Ayazi, Shahin Schwameis, Katrin Zheng, Ping Newhams, Kirsten Myers, Brittney M. Grubic, Andrew D. Hoppo, Toshitaka Jobe, Blair A. Ann Surg Original Articles To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. BACKGROUND: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. METHODS: Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged (P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9891265/ /pubmed/35129522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005239 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ayazi, Shahin
Schwameis, Katrin
Zheng, Ping
Newhams, Kirsten
Myers, Brittney M.
Grubic, Andrew D.
Hoppo, Toshitaka
Jobe, Blair A.
The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title_full The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title_fullStr The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title_short The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics
title_sort impact of magnetic sphincter augmentation (msa) on esophagogastric junction (egj) and esophageal body physiology and manometric characteristics
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005239
work_keys_str_mv AT ayazishahin theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT schwameiskatrin theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT zhengping theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT newhamskirsten theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT myersbrittneym theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT grubicandrewd theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT hoppotoshitaka theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT jobeblaira theimpactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT ayazishahin impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT schwameiskatrin impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT zhengping impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT newhamskirsten impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT myersbrittneym impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT grubicandrewd impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT hoppotoshitaka impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics
AT jobeblaira impactofmagneticsphincteraugmentationmsaonesophagogastricjunctionegjandesophagealbodyphysiologyandmanometriccharacteristics