Cargando…

Self-reported Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Quantitative Bias Analysis

Self-report of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has ~80–90% sensitivity and ~75–85% specificity. We measured the effect of nondifferential exposure misclassification associated with self-reported vaccination on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. METHODS: Between 2017–2019, we recruited sexu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chambers, Catharine, Deeks, Shelley L., Sutradhar, Rinku, Cox, Joseph, de Pokomandy, Alexandra, Grennan, Troy, Hart, Trevor A., Lambert, Gilles, Moore, David M., Grace, Daniel, Grewal, Ramandip, Jollimore, Jody, Lachowsky, Nathan J., Mah, Ashley, Nisenbaum, Rosane, Ogilvie, Gina, Sauvageau, Chantal, Tan, Darrell H.S., Yeung, Anna, Burchell, Ann N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36722804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001580
Descripción
Sumario:Self-report of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has ~80–90% sensitivity and ~75–85% specificity. We measured the effect of nondifferential exposure misclassification associated with self-reported vaccination on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. METHODS: Between 2017–2019, we recruited sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men aged 16–30 years in Canada. VE was derived as 1−prevalence ratio × 100% for prevalent anal HPV infection comparing vaccinated (≥1 dose) to unvaccinated men using a multivariable modified Poisson regression. We conducted a multidimensional and probabilistic quantitative bias analysis to correct VE estimates. RESULTS: Bias-corrected VE estimates were relatively stable across sensitivity values but differed from the uncorrected estimate at lower values of specificity. The median adjusted VE was 27% (2.5–97.5th simulation interval = −5–49%) in the uncorrected analysis, increasing to 39% (2.5–97.5th simulation interval = 2–65%) in the bias-corrected analysis. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of participants erroneously reporting HPV vaccination would be required to meaningfully change VE estimates.