Cargando…

Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study

To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bastiaenen, Vivian P., de Jonge, Joske, Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A., de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J., Kraima, Anne C., Swank, Hilko A., van Vliet, Jaap L.P., van Acker, Gijs J.D., van Geloven, Anna A.W., in ‘t Hof, Klaas H., Koens, Lianne, de Reuver, Philip R., van Rossem, Charles C., Slooter, Gerrit D., Tanis, Pieter J., Terpstra, Valeska, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W., Bemelman, Willem A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228
_version_ 1784881106967855104
author Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
de Jonge, Joske
Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J.
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Vliet, Jaap L.P.
van Acker, Gijs J.D.
van Geloven, Anna A.W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_facet Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
de Jonge, Joske
Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J.
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Vliet, Jaap L.P.
van Acker, Gijs J.D.
van Geloven, Anna A.W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_sort Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
collection PubMed
description To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €725,400 per 10,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9891272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98912722023-02-07 Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study Bastiaenen, Vivian P. de Jonge, Joske Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J. Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Vliet, Jaap L.P. van Acker, Gijs J.D. van Geloven, Anna A.W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W. Bemelman, Willem A. Ann Surg Original Articles To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €725,400 per 10,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9891272/ /pubmed/35072428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
de Jonge, Joske
Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J.
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Vliet, Jaap L.P.
van Acker, Gijs J.D.
van Geloven, Anna A.W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title_full Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title_fullStr Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title_full_unstemmed Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title_short Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
title_sort oncological safety and potential cost savings of routine vs selective histopathological examination after appendectomy: results of the multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional fancy study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228
work_keys_str_mv AT bastiaenenvivianp oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dejongejoske oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT cortenbartholomeusjga oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT kraimaannec oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT swankhilkoa oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanvlietjaaplp oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanackergijsjd oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vangelovenannaaw oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT inthofklaash oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT koenslianne oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dereuverphilipr oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanrossemcharlesc oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT slootergerritd oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT tanispieterj oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT terpstravaleska oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dijkgraafmarcelgw oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT bemelmanwillema oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy