Cargando…
Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228 |
_version_ | 1784881106967855104 |
---|---|
author | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. de Jonge, Joske Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J. Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Vliet, Jaap L.P. van Acker, Gijs J.D. van Geloven, Anna A.W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_facet | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. de Jonge, Joske Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J. Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Vliet, Jaap L.P. van Acker, Gijs J.D. van Geloven, Anna A.W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_sort | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €725,400 per 10,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9891272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98912722023-02-07 Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study Bastiaenen, Vivian P. de Jonge, Joske Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J. Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Vliet, Jaap L.P. van Acker, Gijs J.D. van Geloven, Anna A.W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W. Bemelman, Willem A. Ann Surg Original Articles To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €725,400 per 10,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9891272/ /pubmed/35072428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bastiaenen, Vivian P. de Jonge, Joske Corten, Bartholomeus J.G.A. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A.J. Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Vliet, Jaap L.P. van Acker, Gijs J.D. van Geloven, Anna A.W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W. Bemelman, Willem A. Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title | Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title_full | Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title_fullStr | Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title_short | Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy: Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study |
title_sort | oncological safety and potential cost savings of routine vs selective histopathological examination after appendectomy: results of the multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional fancy study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastiaenenvivianp oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dejongejoske oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT cortenbartholomeusjga oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT kraimaannec oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT swankhilkoa oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanvlietjaaplp oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanackergijsjd oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vangelovenannaaw oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT inthofklaash oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT koenslianne oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dereuverphilipr oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanrossemcharlesc oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT slootergerritd oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT tanispieterj oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT terpstravaleska oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dijkgraafmarcelgw oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT bemelmanwillema oncologicalsafetyandpotentialcostsavingsofroutinevsselectivehistopathologicalexaminationafterappendectomyresultsofthemulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy |