Cargando…

Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood

What kind of practice makes perfect when children learn to use grammatical morphemes in a second language? Gestures are communicative hand and arm movements which teachers naturally employ as a teaching tool in the classroom. Gesture theory has proposed that gestures package information and previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36724183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280543
_version_ 1784881149132144640
author Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha
author_facet Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha
author_sort Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha
collection PubMed
description What kind of practice makes perfect when children learn to use grammatical morphemes in a second language? Gestures are communicative hand and arm movements which teachers naturally employ as a teaching tool in the classroom. Gesture theory has proposed that gestures package information and previous studies suggest their value for teaching specific items, such as words, as well as abstract systems, such as language. There is broad consensus that implicit learning mechanisms in children are more developed than explicit ones and that everyday use of grammar is implicit and entails developing implicit knowledge. However, while many learners have difficulties acquiring new morpho-syntactic structures, such as the plural{-s} and 3(rd) person possessive {-s} in English, research on gesture and syntax in middle childhood remains rare. The present study (N = 19) was conducted to better understand if gestures which embody grammatical morphemes during instruction can contribute to procedural learning. Using a novel task, the gesture speeded fragment completion task, our behavioral results show a decrease in mean response times after instruction in the test condition utilizing syntactically specific gestures. This increase in procedural learning suggests that learners in this age group can benefit from embodied instruction in the classroom which visually differentiates between grammatical morphemes which differ in meaning but sound the same.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9891517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98915172023-02-02 Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha PLoS One Research Article What kind of practice makes perfect when children learn to use grammatical morphemes in a second language? Gestures are communicative hand and arm movements which teachers naturally employ as a teaching tool in the classroom. Gesture theory has proposed that gestures package information and previous studies suggest their value for teaching specific items, such as words, as well as abstract systems, such as language. There is broad consensus that implicit learning mechanisms in children are more developed than explicit ones and that everyday use of grammar is implicit and entails developing implicit knowledge. However, while many learners have difficulties acquiring new morpho-syntactic structures, such as the plural{-s} and 3(rd) person possessive {-s} in English, research on gesture and syntax in middle childhood remains rare. The present study (N = 19) was conducted to better understand if gestures which embody grammatical morphemes during instruction can contribute to procedural learning. Using a novel task, the gesture speeded fragment completion task, our behavioral results show a decrease in mean response times after instruction in the test condition utilizing syntactically specific gestures. This increase in procedural learning suggests that learners in this age group can benefit from embodied instruction in the classroom which visually differentiates between grammatical morphemes which differ in meaning but sound the same. Public Library of Science 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9891517/ /pubmed/36724183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280543 Text en © 2023 Ulbricht Natasha Janzen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janzen Ulbricht, Natasha
Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title_full Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title_fullStr Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title_full_unstemmed Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title_short Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
title_sort can grammatical morphemes be taught? evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36724183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280543
work_keys_str_mv AT janzenulbrichtnatasha cangrammaticalmorphemesbetaughtevidenceofgesturesinfluencingsecondlanguageprocedurallearninginmiddlechildhood