Cargando…

Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the benefits and losses of mammography with and without implant displacement (ID) and propose an appropriate imaging protocol for the screening of breasts with implants. We evaluated mammograms of 162 breasts in 96 patients including 71 breasts with biopsy-proven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jihee, Ko, Eun Young, Han, Boo-Kyung, Ko, Eun Sook, Choi, Ji Soo, Kim, Haejung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28399-1
_version_ 1784881261972553728
author Park, Jihee
Ko, Eun Young
Han, Boo-Kyung
Ko, Eun Sook
Choi, Ji Soo
Kim, Haejung
author_facet Park, Jihee
Ko, Eun Young
Han, Boo-Kyung
Ko, Eun Sook
Choi, Ji Soo
Kim, Haejung
author_sort Park, Jihee
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aimed to evaluate the benefits and losses of mammography with and without implant displacement (ID) and propose an appropriate imaging protocol for the screening of breasts with implants. We evaluated mammograms of 162 breasts in 96 patients including 71 breasts with biopsy-proven cancers. Mammography of each breast included standard MLO and ID MLO images. We reviewed the mammograms using clinical image quality criteria, which consist of parameters that evaluate the proper positioning of the breast and the image resolution. Standard MLO images showed significantly higher scores for proper positioning but showed significantly lower scores for image resolution than the ID MLO images. Moreover, standard MLO images showed significantly higher kVp, mAs, and compressed breast thickness than the ID MLO images. The organ dose was also higher in the standard MLO images than in the ID MLO images, but the difference was not statistically significant. In mammography with proven cancer, ID MLO images showed significantly higher degree of cancer visibility than standard MLO images. For screening mammography in patients with breast implants, ID MLO view alone is sufficient for MLO projection with reducing the patient’s radiation dose without compromising the breast cancer detection capability, especially in dense breasts with subpectoral implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98920262023-02-03 Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants Park, Jihee Ko, Eun Young Han, Boo-Kyung Ko, Eun Sook Choi, Ji Soo Kim, Haejung Sci Rep Article In this study, we aimed to evaluate the benefits and losses of mammography with and without implant displacement (ID) and propose an appropriate imaging protocol for the screening of breasts with implants. We evaluated mammograms of 162 breasts in 96 patients including 71 breasts with biopsy-proven cancers. Mammography of each breast included standard MLO and ID MLO images. We reviewed the mammograms using clinical image quality criteria, which consist of parameters that evaluate the proper positioning of the breast and the image resolution. Standard MLO images showed significantly higher scores for proper positioning but showed significantly lower scores for image resolution than the ID MLO images. Moreover, standard MLO images showed significantly higher kVp, mAs, and compressed breast thickness than the ID MLO images. The organ dose was also higher in the standard MLO images than in the ID MLO images, but the difference was not statistically significant. In mammography with proven cancer, ID MLO images showed significantly higher degree of cancer visibility than standard MLO images. For screening mammography in patients with breast implants, ID MLO view alone is sufficient for MLO projection with reducing the patient’s radiation dose without compromising the breast cancer detection capability, especially in dense breasts with subpectoral implants. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9892026/ /pubmed/36725965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28399-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Park, Jihee
Ko, Eun Young
Han, Boo-Kyung
Ko, Eun Sook
Choi, Ji Soo
Kim, Haejung
Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title_full Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title_fullStr Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title_short Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
title_sort appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28399-1
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjihee appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants
AT koeunyoung appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants
AT hanbookyung appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants
AT koeunsook appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants
AT choijisoo appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants
AT kimhaejung appropriatescreeningmammographymethodforpatientswithbreastimplants