Cargando…
Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (ener...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z |
_version_ | 1784881284417323008 |
---|---|
author | Khezri, Mohsen Mamghaderi, Mahnaz Razzaghi, Somayeh Heshmati, Almas |
author_facet | Khezri, Mohsen Mamghaderi, Mahnaz Razzaghi, Somayeh Heshmati, Almas |
author_sort | Khezri, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (energy consumption, labor force, and capital stock), one desirable output (GDP), and different undesirable outputs (CO(2) emissions, ecological footprint indicators) are applied to 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. According to the results, Norway, Luxemburg, and United Kingdom are the most environmentally efficient countries in terms of environmental efficiency and ecological footprint efficiency. On the other hand, the lowest environmental and ecological footprint efficiencies were in countries like Lithuania, Slovak, Czech, Estonia, and the USA. In addition, these nations fare poorly regarding their carbon footprint and farmland efficiency. In further detail, Lithuania, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain have a critical status in fishing ground efficiency, while the forest area efficiency is very acute in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Czech. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9892135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98921352023-02-03 Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint Khezri, Mohsen Mamghaderi, Mahnaz Razzaghi, Somayeh Heshmati, Almas Environ Manage Article This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (energy consumption, labor force, and capital stock), one desirable output (GDP), and different undesirable outputs (CO(2) emissions, ecological footprint indicators) are applied to 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. According to the results, Norway, Luxemburg, and United Kingdom are the most environmentally efficient countries in terms of environmental efficiency and ecological footprint efficiency. On the other hand, the lowest environmental and ecological footprint efficiencies were in countries like Lithuania, Slovak, Czech, Estonia, and the USA. In addition, these nations fare poorly regarding their carbon footprint and farmland efficiency. In further detail, Lithuania, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain have a critical status in fishing ground efficiency, while the forest area efficiency is very acute in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Czech. Springer US 2022-11-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9892135/ /pubmed/36396858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Khezri, Mohsen Mamghaderi, Mahnaz Razzaghi, Somayeh Heshmati, Almas Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title | Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title_full | Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title_short | Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint |
title_sort | comprehensive environmental assessment index of ecological footprint |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khezrimohsen comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint AT mamghaderimahnaz comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint AT razzaghisomayeh comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint AT heshmatialmas comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint |