Cargando…

Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint

This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (ener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khezri, Mohsen, Mamghaderi, Mahnaz, Razzaghi, Somayeh, Heshmati, Almas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z
_version_ 1784881284417323008
author Khezri, Mohsen
Mamghaderi, Mahnaz
Razzaghi, Somayeh
Heshmati, Almas
author_facet Khezri, Mohsen
Mamghaderi, Mahnaz
Razzaghi, Somayeh
Heshmati, Almas
author_sort Khezri, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (energy consumption, labor force, and capital stock), one desirable output (GDP), and different undesirable outputs (CO(2) emissions, ecological footprint indicators) are applied to 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. According to the results, Norway, Luxemburg, and United Kingdom are the most environmentally efficient countries in terms of environmental efficiency and ecological footprint efficiency. On the other hand, the lowest environmental and ecological footprint efficiencies were in countries like Lithuania, Slovak, Czech, Estonia, and the USA. In addition, these nations fare poorly regarding their carbon footprint and farmland efficiency. In further detail, Lithuania, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain have a critical status in fishing ground efficiency, while the forest area efficiency is very acute in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Czech.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98921352023-02-03 Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint Khezri, Mohsen Mamghaderi, Mahnaz Razzaghi, Somayeh Heshmati, Almas Environ Manage Article This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (energy consumption, labor force, and capital stock), one desirable output (GDP), and different undesirable outputs (CO(2) emissions, ecological footprint indicators) are applied to 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. According to the results, Norway, Luxemburg, and United Kingdom are the most environmentally efficient countries in terms of environmental efficiency and ecological footprint efficiency. On the other hand, the lowest environmental and ecological footprint efficiencies were in countries like Lithuania, Slovak, Czech, Estonia, and the USA. In addition, these nations fare poorly regarding their carbon footprint and farmland efficiency. In further detail, Lithuania, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain have a critical status in fishing ground efficiency, while the forest area efficiency is very acute in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Czech. Springer US 2022-11-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9892135/ /pubmed/36396858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Khezri, Mohsen
Mamghaderi, Mahnaz
Razzaghi, Somayeh
Heshmati, Almas
Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title_full Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title_fullStr Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title_short Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint
title_sort comprehensive environmental assessment index of ecological footprint
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z
work_keys_str_mv AT khezrimohsen comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint
AT mamghaderimahnaz comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint
AT razzaghisomayeh comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint
AT heshmatialmas comprehensiveenvironmentalassessmentindexofecologicalfootprint