Cargando…

Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference

PURPOSE: To validate QSM‐based biomagnetic liver susceptometry (BLS) to measure liver iron overload at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID)‐based BLS as reference. METHODS: Subjects with known or suspected iron overload were recruited for QSM‐BLS at 1.5 T and 3....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Ruiyang, Velikina, Julia, Reeder, Scott B., Vasanawala, Shreyas, Jeng, Michael, Hernando, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29529
_version_ 1784881303310565376
author Zhao, Ruiyang
Velikina, Julia
Reeder, Scott B.
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Jeng, Michael
Hernando, Diego
author_facet Zhao, Ruiyang
Velikina, Julia
Reeder, Scott B.
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Jeng, Michael
Hernando, Diego
author_sort Zhao, Ruiyang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To validate QSM‐based biomagnetic liver susceptometry (BLS) to measure liver iron overload at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID)‐based BLS as reference. METHODS: Subjects with known or suspected iron overload were recruited for QSM‐BLS at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using eight different protocols. SQUID‐BLS was also obtained in each subject to provide susceptibility reference. A recent QSM method based on data‐adaptive regularization was used to obtain susceptibility and [Formula: see text] maps. Measurements of susceptibility and [Formula: see text] were obtained in the right liver lobe. Linear mixed‐effects analysis was used to estimate the contribution of specific acquisition parameters to QSM‐BLS. Linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses were used to assess the relationship between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS/ [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: Susceptibility maps showed high subjective quality for each acquisition protocol across different iron levels. High linear correlation was observed between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS at 1.5 T (r (2) range, [0.82, 0.84]) and 3.0 T (r (2) range, [0.77, 0.85]) across different acquisition protocols. QSM‐BLS and [Formula: see text] were highly correlated at both field strengths (r (2) range at 1.5 T, [0.94, 0.99]; 3.0 T, [0.93, 0.99]). High correlation (r (2) = 0.99) between 1.5 T and 3.0 T QSM‐BLS, with narrow reproducibility coefficients (range, [0.13, 0.21] ppm) were observed for each protocol. CONCLUSION: This work evaluated the feasibility and performance of liver QSM‐BLS across iron levels and acquisition protocols at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. High correlation and reproducibility were observed between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS across protocols and field strengths. In summary, QSM‐BLS may enable reliable and reproducible quantification of liver iron concentration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98922912023-04-14 Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference Zhao, Ruiyang Velikina, Julia Reeder, Scott B. Vasanawala, Shreyas Jeng, Michael Hernando, Diego Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: To validate QSM‐based biomagnetic liver susceptometry (BLS) to measure liver iron overload at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID)‐based BLS as reference. METHODS: Subjects with known or suspected iron overload were recruited for QSM‐BLS at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using eight different protocols. SQUID‐BLS was also obtained in each subject to provide susceptibility reference. A recent QSM method based on data‐adaptive regularization was used to obtain susceptibility and [Formula: see text] maps. Measurements of susceptibility and [Formula: see text] were obtained in the right liver lobe. Linear mixed‐effects analysis was used to estimate the contribution of specific acquisition parameters to QSM‐BLS. Linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses were used to assess the relationship between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS/ [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: Susceptibility maps showed high subjective quality for each acquisition protocol across different iron levels. High linear correlation was observed between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS at 1.5 T (r (2) range, [0.82, 0.84]) and 3.0 T (r (2) range, [0.77, 0.85]) across different acquisition protocols. QSM‐BLS and [Formula: see text] were highly correlated at both field strengths (r (2) range at 1.5 T, [0.94, 0.99]; 3.0 T, [0.93, 0.99]). High correlation (r (2) = 0.99) between 1.5 T and 3.0 T QSM‐BLS, with narrow reproducibility coefficients (range, [0.13, 0.21] ppm) were observed for each protocol. CONCLUSION: This work evaluated the feasibility and performance of liver QSM‐BLS across iron levels and acquisition protocols at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. High correlation and reproducibility were observed between QSM‐BLS and SQUID‐BLS across protocols and field strengths. In summary, QSM‐BLS may enable reliable and reproducible quantification of liver iron concentration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-21 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9892291/ /pubmed/36408802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29529 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Imaging Methodology
Zhao, Ruiyang
Velikina, Julia
Reeder, Scott B.
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Jeng, Michael
Hernando, Diego
Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title_full Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title_fullStr Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title_full_unstemmed Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title_short Validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using SQUID susceptometry as reference
title_sort validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping across imaging parameters at 1.5 t and 3.0 t using squid susceptometry as reference
topic Research Articles—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29529
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoruiyang validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference
AT velikinajulia validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference
AT reederscottb validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference
AT vasanawalashreyas validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference
AT jengmichael validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference
AT hernandodiego validationofliverquantitativesusceptibilitymappingacrossimagingparametersat15tand30tusingsquidsusceptometryasreference