Cargando…

Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade

BACKGROUND: Cardiac tamponade is a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiac interventions. Despite prompt pericardiocentesis, clinical management can be challenging and sometimes haemodynamic stabilisation is difficult to achieve. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection after pericardiocentesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rottländer, D., Saal, M., Degen, H., Haude, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y
_version_ 1784881316093755392
author Rottländer, D.
Saal, M.
Degen, H.
Haude, M.
author_facet Rottländer, D.
Saal, M.
Degen, H.
Haude, M.
author_sort Rottländer, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac tamponade is a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiac interventions. Despite prompt pericardiocentesis, clinical management can be challenging and sometimes haemodynamic stabilisation is difficult to achieve. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection after pericardiocentesis promotes haemostasis and acts as a sealing agent, as previously described for left ventricular free-wall rupture. We aimed to evaluate intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy for pericardial tamponade following percutaneous cardiac interventions. METHODS: In a 5-year single-centre retrospective analysis we identified 31 patients with cardiac tamponade due to percutaneous intracardiac procedures. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy was administered in 5 of 31 patients (16.1%). RESULTS: Patients receiving intra-pericardial thrombin were in a more critical state when thrombin was applied, as demonstrated by a higher rate of resuscitation (40% versus 26.9%) and a trend toward a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (177.6 ± 84.0 vs 98.0 ± 31.4 h). None of the patients with pericardial tamponades treated with intra-pericardial thrombin needed cardiothoracic surgery. Mortality after 30 days was lower with intra-pericardial thrombin injection than with standard treatment (0% vs 15.4%). We observed no complications using intra-pericardial thrombin. CONCLUSION: Intra-pericardial thrombin injection could be considered as a bailout strategy for patients with iatrogenic pericardial tamponade due to percutaneous procedures. We recommend further evaluation of this technique in the clinical management of refractory pericardial tamponade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98924082023-02-03 Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade Rottländer, D. Saal, M. Degen, H. Haude, M. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Cardiac tamponade is a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiac interventions. Despite prompt pericardiocentesis, clinical management can be challenging and sometimes haemodynamic stabilisation is difficult to achieve. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection after pericardiocentesis promotes haemostasis and acts as a sealing agent, as previously described for left ventricular free-wall rupture. We aimed to evaluate intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy for pericardial tamponade following percutaneous cardiac interventions. METHODS: In a 5-year single-centre retrospective analysis we identified 31 patients with cardiac tamponade due to percutaneous intracardiac procedures. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy was administered in 5 of 31 patients (16.1%). RESULTS: Patients receiving intra-pericardial thrombin were in a more critical state when thrombin was applied, as demonstrated by a higher rate of resuscitation (40% versus 26.9%) and a trend toward a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (177.6 ± 84.0 vs 98.0 ± 31.4 h). None of the patients with pericardial tamponades treated with intra-pericardial thrombin needed cardiothoracic surgery. Mortality after 30 days was lower with intra-pericardial thrombin injection than with standard treatment (0% vs 15.4%). We observed no complications using intra-pericardial thrombin. CONCLUSION: Intra-pericardial thrombin injection could be considered as a bailout strategy for patients with iatrogenic pericardial tamponade due to percutaneous procedures. We recommend further evaluation of this technique in the clinical management of refractory pericardial tamponade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2022-06-01 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9892408/ /pubmed/35648265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Rottländer, D.
Saal, M.
Degen, H.
Haude, M.
Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title_full Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title_fullStr Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title_full_unstemmed Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title_short Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
title_sort intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rottlanderd intrapericardialthrombininjectionasbailoutstrategyiniatrogenicpericardialtamponade
AT saalm intrapericardialthrombininjectionasbailoutstrategyiniatrogenicpericardialtamponade
AT degenh intrapericardialthrombininjectionasbailoutstrategyiniatrogenicpericardialtamponade
AT haudem intrapericardialthrombininjectionasbailoutstrategyiniatrogenicpericardialtamponade