Cargando…
Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493 |
_version_ | 1784881328963977216 |
---|---|
author | Farshchi, Sara Andersson, Annika van de Weijer, Joost Paradis, Carita |
author_facet | Farshchi, Sara Andersson, Annika van de Weijer, Joost Paradis, Carita |
author_sort | Farshchi, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of these studies have suggested processing costs in connection to negation (increased negativities in brain responses), it is difficult to know how this translates into processing of spoken language. We therefore developed an auditory paradigm based on a previous visual study investigating processing of affirmatives, sentential negation (not), and prefixal negation (un-). The findings of processing costs were replicated but differed in the details. Importantly, the pattern of ERP effects suggested less effortful processing for auditorily presented negated forms (restricted to increased anterior and posterior positivities) in comparison to visually presented negated forms. We suggest that the natural flow of spoken language reduces variability in processing and therefore results in clearer ERP patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9892462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98924622023-02-03 Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality Farshchi, Sara Andersson, Annika van de Weijer, Joost Paradis, Carita Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of these studies have suggested processing costs in connection to negation (increased negativities in brain responses), it is difficult to know how this translates into processing of spoken language. We therefore developed an auditory paradigm based on a previous visual study investigating processing of affirmatives, sentential negation (not), and prefixal negation (un-). The findings of processing costs were replicated but differed in the details. Importantly, the pattern of ERP effects suggested less effortful processing for auditorily presented negated forms (restricted to increased anterior and posterior positivities) in comparison to visually presented negated forms. We suggest that the natural flow of spoken language reduces variability in processing and therefore results in clearer ERP patterns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9892462/ /pubmed/36742356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493 Text en Copyright © 2023 Farshchi, Andersson, van de Weijer and Paradis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Farshchi, Sara Andersson, Annika van de Weijer, Joost Paradis, Carita Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title | Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title_full | Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title_fullStr | Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title_short | Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
title_sort | brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farshchisara brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality AT anderssonannika brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality AT vandeweijerjoost brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality AT paradiscarita brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality |