Cargando…

Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality

Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farshchi, Sara, Andersson, Annika, van de Weijer, Joost, Paradis, Carita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493
_version_ 1784881328963977216
author Farshchi, Sara
Andersson, Annika
van de Weijer, Joost
Paradis, Carita
author_facet Farshchi, Sara
Andersson, Annika
van de Weijer, Joost
Paradis, Carita
author_sort Farshchi, Sara
collection PubMed
description Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of these studies have suggested processing costs in connection to negation (increased negativities in brain responses), it is difficult to know how this translates into processing of spoken language. We therefore developed an auditory paradigm based on a previous visual study investigating processing of affirmatives, sentential negation (not), and prefixal negation (un-). The findings of processing costs were replicated but differed in the details. Importantly, the pattern of ERP effects suggested less effortful processing for auditorily presented negated forms (restricted to increased anterior and posterior positivities) in comparison to visually presented negated forms. We suggest that the natural flow of spoken language reduces variability in processing and therefore results in clearer ERP patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98924622023-02-03 Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality Farshchi, Sara Andersson, Annika van de Weijer, Joost Paradis, Carita Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Negation is frequently used in natural language, yet relatively little is known about its processing. More importantly, what is known regarding the neurophysiological processing of negation is mostly based on results of studies using written stimuli (the word-by-word paradigm). While the results of these studies have suggested processing costs in connection to negation (increased negativities in brain responses), it is difficult to know how this translates into processing of spoken language. We therefore developed an auditory paradigm based on a previous visual study investigating processing of affirmatives, sentential negation (not), and prefixal negation (un-). The findings of processing costs were replicated but differed in the details. Importantly, the pattern of ERP effects suggested less effortful processing for auditorily presented negated forms (restricted to increased anterior and posterior positivities) in comparison to visually presented negated forms. We suggest that the natural flow of spoken language reduces variability in processing and therefore results in clearer ERP patterns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9892462/ /pubmed/36742356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493 Text en Copyright © 2023 Farshchi, Andersson, van de Weijer and Paradis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Farshchi, Sara
Andersson, Annika
van de Weijer, Joost
Paradis, Carita
Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title_full Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title_fullStr Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title_full_unstemmed Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title_short Brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
title_sort brain responses to negated and affirmative meanings in the auditory modality
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1079493
work_keys_str_mv AT farshchisara brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality
AT anderssonannika brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality
AT vandeweijerjoost brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality
AT paradiscarita brainresponsestonegatedandaffirmativemeaningsintheauditorymodality