Cargando…

Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost between ultrasound-guided shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) with an early second session protocol and ureteroscopy (URS) in patients with proximal ureteral stones using the propensity score matching (PSM) method based on a large prospective study. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wang, Peng, Zhan, Yunhong, Li, Jia, Liu, Gang, Li, Zhenhua, Bai, Song
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04307-0

Ejemplares similares

Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
por: Khalil, Mostafa
Publicado: (2013)

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones
por: Lee, Jong-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non–lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Bai, Song, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
por: Demirelli, Erhan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm
por: Yao, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
por: Hu, Henglong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Management of upper ureteral stones exceeding 15 mm in diameter: Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser lithotripsy
por: Aboutaleb, Hamdy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Association between time to lithotripsy and stone-free rate in patients with ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
por: Washino, Satoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi
por: Ur Rehman, Muhammad Fazal, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
por: Yazici, Ozgur, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL)
por: Rabani, Seyed Mohammadreza, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Semi-rigid ureteroscopy: Proximal versus distal ureteral stones
por: Alameddine, Mahmoud, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
por: Abdelghany, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Usefulness of Early Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Colic Patients with Ureteral Stones
por: Choi, Hyeung Joon, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity
por: Yoon, Ji Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast
por: Tawfick, Ehab R
Publicado: (2010)

RE: Semi-rigid ureteroscopy – Proximal versus distal ureteral stone
por: Kamarulzaman, Mohd. Nazli
Publicado: (2016)

Primary Ureteroscopy without Pre-Stenting for Proximal Ureteral Stones—Is It Feasible?
por: Lazarovich, Alon, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort
por: Zhang, Lvwen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Is semirigid ureteroscopy sufficient in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones? When is combined therapy with flexible ureteroscopy needed?
por: Turkan, Sadi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone
por: Chang, Ki Don, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Geraghty, Robert M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis
por: Peng, Cheng-Xia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Retrospective comparative study of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteral stones
por: Galal, Ehab Mohamad, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Does treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney or ureteral stones?
por: Muruganandham, K., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

The Effect of Tamsulosin on Pain and Clearance According to Ureteral Stone Location After Shock Wave Lithotripsy()
por: Basri Cakıroglu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones
por: Kang, Dong Hyuk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Tamsulosin After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a Single Proximal Ureteral Stone
por: Park, Yong Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Holmium Laser Lithotripsy with Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy: A First-Choice Treatment for Impacted Ureteral Stones in Children?
por: Adanur, Senol, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO
por: Vicentini, Fabio C.
Publicado: (2015)

Flexible Ureteroscopy Can Be More Efficacious in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones in Select Patients
por: Alkan, Erdal, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
por: Müllhaupt, Gautier, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Double J stent reduces the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lumbar ureteral stones
por: Pettenati, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?
por: Turan, Turgay, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Efficiency of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones: An Unjustly Forgotten Option?
por: Alić, Jasmin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development and validation of a predictive model for major complications after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones: based on a large prospective cohort
por: Na, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Definitive ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral calculi during pregnancy
por: Teleb, Mohamed, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: YES
por: J.F., Donaldson
Publicado: (2015)

Shock wave lithotripsy as a primary modality for treating upper ureteric stones: A 10-year experience
por: Padhye, Abhijit S., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_unafpuhni7hm1gduettbbm3tsq