Cargando…

基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析

Qinggusan is the 69th prescription in the first batch of “Catalogue of Ancient Chinese Classic Formulas”. In modern clinical practice, Qinggusan is mainly used to treat noninfectious fever. However, because few studies on Qinggusan reference samples and their quality value transfer are available, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: XU, Xin, WEI, Tong, XUE, Qianqian, AI, Jiahao, LI, Guixin, LIU, Zhongguo, LI, Dan, HOU, Jincai, JIN, Hongli, LIU, Yanfang, LIANG, Xinmiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09024
_version_ 1784881427595132928
author XU, Xin
WEI, Tong
XUE, Qianqian
AI, Jiahao
LI, Guixin
LIU, Zhongguo
LI, Dan
HOU, Jincai
JIN, Hongli
LIU, Yanfang
LIANG, Xinmiao
author_facet XU, Xin
WEI, Tong
XUE, Qianqian
AI, Jiahao
LI, Guixin
LIU, Zhongguo
LI, Dan
HOU, Jincai
JIN, Hongli
LIU, Yanfang
LIANG, Xinmiao
author_sort XU, Xin
collection PubMed
description Qinggusan is the 69th prescription in the first batch of “Catalogue of Ancient Chinese Classic Formulas”. In modern clinical practice, Qinggusan is mainly used to treat noninfectious fever. However, because few studies on Qinggusan reference samples and their quality value transfer are available, the development and promotion of its compound preparations are restricted. Therefore, establishing an accurate and comprehensive quality control method to clarify the critical quality attributes of Qinggusan reference samples is of great importance. In this study, 15 batches of Qinggusan reference samples were processed to determine the range of their dry extract ratios. Quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprint analysis was performed using a Waters Symmetry Shield RP18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm) with acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution as the mobile phase in gradient elution mode. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the column temperature was 30 ℃, and the detection wavelength was 254 nm. The HPLC fingerprints of the Qinggusan reference samples were established under these conditions to evaluate their similarity. The established method was systematically validated and found to demonstrate good precision, repeatability, and sample stability. Subsequently, characteristic peaks were identified and attributed by HPLC-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (HPLC-Q-TOF-MS) analysis. MS was performed in electrospray ionization mode, the data were collected in both positive- and negative-ion modes, and the detection range was m/z 50-2000. The contents and transfer rate ranges of the index components, namely, gentiopicrin, mangiferin, picroside Ⅱ, picroside Ⅰ, and glycyrrhizic acid, were determined to analyze the quality value transfer of the samples. The results demonstrated that the dry extract rate of the 15 batches of Qinggusan reference samples ranged from 24.10% to 26.88% and that their fingerprint similarities were generally greater than 0.95. Twelve common peaks were identified by reference identification, literature comparison, and high-resolution MS analysis. Twelve compounds, including six iridoid glycosides, two flavonoids, one alkaloid, one triterpenoid saponin, and two others. Among them, L-picein, androsin, picroside Ⅳ, picroside Ⅱ and picroside Ⅰ were from Picrorhizae Rhizoma, loganin acid, swertiamarin and gentiopicrin were from Gentianae Macrophyllae Radix, neomangiferin and mangiferin were from Anemarrhenae Rhizoma, dichotomine B was from Stellariae Radix, and glycyrrhizic acid was from Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma. The five key components presented good linear relationships in their respective linear ranges, and all correlation coefficients were higher than 0.999. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of precision, stability, and repeatability were less than 1.3%. The average recoveries varied between 95.92% and 102.5%, with RSDs less than 3.9%; these values meet the requirements defined in the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The contents of gentiopicrin, mangiferin, picroside Ⅱ, picroside Ⅰ, and glycyrrhizic acid in the 15 batches of reference samples were in the range of 17.92-27.55, 1.83-4.42, 23.08-36.44, 8.43-15.04, and 0.94-2.39 mg/g, respectively, and their transfer rates from the decoction pieces to the reference samples were 47.91%-63.95%, 22.96%-59.39%, 60.82%-77.82%, 64.25%-99.53%, and 15.30%-39.30%, respectively. In this study, the chemical components of Qinggusan reference samples were comprehensively identified and their quality value transfer was studied through the combination of HPLC fingerprinting and MS. Clarification of the critical quality attributes of Qinggusan reference samples could provide a basis for the quality control of Qinggusan compound preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98929752023-02-08 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析 XU, Xin WEI, Tong XUE, Qianqian AI, Jiahao LI, Guixin LIU, Zhongguo LI, Dan HOU, Jincai JIN, Hongli LIU, Yanfang LIANG, Xinmiao Se Pu Articles Qinggusan is the 69th prescription in the first batch of “Catalogue of Ancient Chinese Classic Formulas”. In modern clinical practice, Qinggusan is mainly used to treat noninfectious fever. However, because few studies on Qinggusan reference samples and their quality value transfer are available, the development and promotion of its compound preparations are restricted. Therefore, establishing an accurate and comprehensive quality control method to clarify the critical quality attributes of Qinggusan reference samples is of great importance. In this study, 15 batches of Qinggusan reference samples were processed to determine the range of their dry extract ratios. Quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprint analysis was performed using a Waters Symmetry Shield RP18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm) with acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution as the mobile phase in gradient elution mode. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the column temperature was 30 ℃, and the detection wavelength was 254 nm. The HPLC fingerprints of the Qinggusan reference samples were established under these conditions to evaluate their similarity. The established method was systematically validated and found to demonstrate good precision, repeatability, and sample stability. Subsequently, characteristic peaks were identified and attributed by HPLC-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (HPLC-Q-TOF-MS) analysis. MS was performed in electrospray ionization mode, the data were collected in both positive- and negative-ion modes, and the detection range was m/z 50-2000. The contents and transfer rate ranges of the index components, namely, gentiopicrin, mangiferin, picroside Ⅱ, picroside Ⅰ, and glycyrrhizic acid, were determined to analyze the quality value transfer of the samples. The results demonstrated that the dry extract rate of the 15 batches of Qinggusan reference samples ranged from 24.10% to 26.88% and that their fingerprint similarities were generally greater than 0.95. Twelve common peaks were identified by reference identification, literature comparison, and high-resolution MS analysis. Twelve compounds, including six iridoid glycosides, two flavonoids, one alkaloid, one triterpenoid saponin, and two others. Among them, L-picein, androsin, picroside Ⅳ, picroside Ⅱ and picroside Ⅰ were from Picrorhizae Rhizoma, loganin acid, swertiamarin and gentiopicrin were from Gentianae Macrophyllae Radix, neomangiferin and mangiferin were from Anemarrhenae Rhizoma, dichotomine B was from Stellariae Radix, and glycyrrhizic acid was from Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma. The five key components presented good linear relationships in their respective linear ranges, and all correlation coefficients were higher than 0.999. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of precision, stability, and repeatability were less than 1.3%. The average recoveries varied between 95.92% and 102.5%, with RSDs less than 3.9%; these values meet the requirements defined in the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The contents of gentiopicrin, mangiferin, picroside Ⅱ, picroside Ⅰ, and glycyrrhizic acid in the 15 batches of reference samples were in the range of 17.92-27.55, 1.83-4.42, 23.08-36.44, 8.43-15.04, and 0.94-2.39 mg/g, respectively, and their transfer rates from the decoction pieces to the reference samples were 47.91%-63.95%, 22.96%-59.39%, 60.82%-77.82%, 64.25%-99.53%, and 15.30%-39.30%, respectively. In this study, the chemical components of Qinggusan reference samples were comprehensively identified and their quality value transfer was studied through the combination of HPLC fingerprinting and MS. Clarification of the critical quality attributes of Qinggusan reference samples could provide a basis for the quality control of Qinggusan compound preparations. Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9892975/ /pubmed/36725710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09024 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/本文是开放获取文章,遵循CC BY 4.0协议 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
XU, Xin
WEI, Tong
XUE, Qianqian
AI, Jiahao
LI, Guixin
LIU, Zhongguo
LI, Dan
HOU, Jincai
JIN, Hongli
LIU, Yanfang
LIANG, Xinmiao
基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title_full 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title_fullStr 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title_full_unstemmed 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title_short 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
title_sort 基于定量指纹图谱技术的经典名方清骨散基准样品量值传递分析
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09024
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxin jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT weitong jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT xueqianqian jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT aijiahao jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT liguixin jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT liuzhongguo jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT lidan jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT houjincai jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT jinhongli jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT liuyanfang jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī
AT liangxinmiao jīyúdìngliàngzhǐwéntúpǔjìshùdejīngdiǎnmíngfāngqīnggǔsànjīzhǔnyàngpǐnliàngzhíchuándìfēnxī