Cargando…

Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savira, Feby, Gupta, Adyya, Gilbert, Cecily, Huggins, Catherine E, Browning, Colette, Chapman, Wendy, Haines, Terry, Peeters, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36652291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38081
_version_ 1784881431115202560
author Savira, Feby
Gupta, Adyya
Gilbert, Cecily
Huggins, Catherine E
Browning, Colette
Chapman, Wendy
Haines, Terry
Peeters, Anna
author_facet Savira, Feby
Gupta, Adyya
Gilbert, Cecily
Huggins, Catherine E
Browning, Colette
Chapman, Wendy
Haines, Terry
Peeters, Anna
author_sort Savira, Feby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization’s digital health evaluation framework. RESULTS: Among the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9892987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98929872023-02-03 Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review Savira, Feby Gupta, Adyya Gilbert, Cecily Huggins, Catherine E Browning, Colette Chapman, Wendy Haines, Terry Peeters, Anna J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization’s digital health evaluation framework. RESULTS: Among the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers. JMIR Publications 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9892987/ /pubmed/36652291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38081 Text en ©Feby Savira, Adyya Gupta, Cecily Gilbert, Catherine E Huggins, Colette Browning, Wendy Chapman, Terry Haines, Anna Peeters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 18.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Savira, Feby
Gupta, Adyya
Gilbert, Cecily
Huggins, Catherine E
Browning, Colette
Chapman, Wendy
Haines, Terry
Peeters, Anna
Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title_full Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title_short Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review
title_sort virtual care initiatives for older adults in australia: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36652291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38081
work_keys_str_mv AT savirafeby virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT guptaadyya virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT gilbertcecily virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT hugginscatherinee virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT browningcolette virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT chapmanwendy virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT hainesterry virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview
AT peetersanna virtualcareinitiativesforolderadultsinaustraliascopingreview