Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability

Purpose: 1) to explore the test-retest reliability of a new device for measuring ankle inversion proprioception during walking, i.e., the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus—Walking (AIDAW) in individuals with or without Chronic Ankle instability (CAI); 2) to assess its discriminant validity in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Xuerong, Kang, Ming, Luan, Lijiang, Deng, Fawei, Adams, Roger, Wu, Tao, Han, Jia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36744024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1036194
_version_ 1784881434604863488
author Shao, Xuerong
Kang, Ming
Luan, Lijiang
Deng, Fawei
Adams, Roger
Wu, Tao
Han, Jia
author_facet Shao, Xuerong
Kang, Ming
Luan, Lijiang
Deng, Fawei
Adams, Roger
Wu, Tao
Han, Jia
author_sort Shao, Xuerong
collection PubMed
description Purpose: 1) to explore the test-retest reliability of a new device for measuring ankle inversion proprioception during walking, i.e., the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus—Walking (AIDAW) in individuals with or without Chronic Ankle instability (CAI); 2) to assess its discriminant validity in differentiating individuals with or without CAI; 3) to investigate its convergent validity by examining its association with Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and the Y Balance Test (YBT). Methods: For test-retest reliability, 15 participants with CAI and 15 non-CAI healthy controls were recruited. Participants completed the AIDAW test twice with a 7-day interval. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was obtained as the AIDAW score. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and MDC(90) were calculated. For the validity study, another 20 individuals with CAI and 20 non-CAI healthy controls were involved. The AIDAW scores were analyzed by an independent samples t-test, and the optimal cutoff value of AIDAW scores to best distinguish individuals with CAI was calculated by Youden’s index. Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between AIDAW proprioceptive scores and the CAIT and final YBT scores. Results: For test-retest reliability, the ICC values for the CAI, non-CAI, and the whole group were 0.755, 0.757, and 0.761 respectively. The MDC(90) of the CAI and non-CAI group was 0.04 and 0.05. Regarding discriminant validity, the AIDAW proprioceptive discrimination scores in the CAI group were significantly lower than those in the non-CAI group (p = 0.003); and the cutoff score for distinguishing CAI from the non-CAI participants was 0.759. For convergent validity, the AIDAW scores were significantly correlated with the functional balance YBT final scores (p = 0.001) and the CAIT scores (p = 0.009). Conclusion: The AIDAW is a reliable and valid device for evaluating ankle inversion proprioception during walking in individuals with and without CAI. AIDAW can be used as a clinical assessment tool to discriminate CAI from non-CAI individuals and to monitor effects of rehabilitation. The AIDAW proprioceptive discrimination scores were significantly and positively correlated with YBT and CAIT scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9893012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98930122023-02-03 Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability Shao, Xuerong Kang, Ming Luan, Lijiang Deng, Fawei Adams, Roger Wu, Tao Han, Jia Front Physiol Physiology Purpose: 1) to explore the test-retest reliability of a new device for measuring ankle inversion proprioception during walking, i.e., the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus—Walking (AIDAW) in individuals with or without Chronic Ankle instability (CAI); 2) to assess its discriminant validity in differentiating individuals with or without CAI; 3) to investigate its convergent validity by examining its association with Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and the Y Balance Test (YBT). Methods: For test-retest reliability, 15 participants with CAI and 15 non-CAI healthy controls were recruited. Participants completed the AIDAW test twice with a 7-day interval. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was obtained as the AIDAW score. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and MDC(90) were calculated. For the validity study, another 20 individuals with CAI and 20 non-CAI healthy controls were involved. The AIDAW scores were analyzed by an independent samples t-test, and the optimal cutoff value of AIDAW scores to best distinguish individuals with CAI was calculated by Youden’s index. Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between AIDAW proprioceptive scores and the CAIT and final YBT scores. Results: For test-retest reliability, the ICC values for the CAI, non-CAI, and the whole group were 0.755, 0.757, and 0.761 respectively. The MDC(90) of the CAI and non-CAI group was 0.04 and 0.05. Regarding discriminant validity, the AIDAW proprioceptive discrimination scores in the CAI group were significantly lower than those in the non-CAI group (p = 0.003); and the cutoff score for distinguishing CAI from the non-CAI participants was 0.759. For convergent validity, the AIDAW scores were significantly correlated with the functional balance YBT final scores (p = 0.001) and the CAIT scores (p = 0.009). Conclusion: The AIDAW is a reliable and valid device for evaluating ankle inversion proprioception during walking in individuals with and without CAI. AIDAW can be used as a clinical assessment tool to discriminate CAI from non-CAI individuals and to monitor effects of rehabilitation. The AIDAW proprioceptive discrimination scores were significantly and positively correlated with YBT and CAIT scores. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9893012/ /pubmed/36744024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1036194 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shao, Kang, Luan, Deng, Adams, Wu and Han. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Shao, Xuerong
Kang, Ming
Luan, Lijiang
Deng, Fawei
Adams, Roger
Wu, Tao
Han, Jia
Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title_full Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title_short Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
title_sort reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36744024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1036194
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoxuerong reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT kangming reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT luanlijiang reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT dengfawei reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT adamsroger reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT wutao reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability
AT hanjia reliabilityandvalidityoftheankleinversiondiscriminationapparatusduringwalkinginindividualswithchronicankleinstability