Cargando…

Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop

In the past decade, the potential of positioning LED lamps in between the canopy (intra-canopy) to enhance crop growth and yield has been explored in greenhouse cultivation. Changes in spatial heterogeneity of light absorption that come with the introduction of intra-canopy lighting have not been th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schipper, R., van der Meer, M., de Visser, P.H.B., Heuvelink, E., Marcelis, L.F.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1012529
_version_ 1784881459096453120
author Schipper, R.
van der Meer, M.
de Visser, P.H.B.
Heuvelink, E.
Marcelis, L.F.M.
author_facet Schipper, R.
van der Meer, M.
de Visser, P.H.B.
Heuvelink, E.
Marcelis, L.F.M.
author_sort Schipper, R.
collection PubMed
description In the past decade, the potential of positioning LED lamps in between the canopy (intra-canopy) to enhance crop growth and yield has been explored in greenhouse cultivation. Changes in spatial heterogeneity of light absorption that come with the introduction of intra-canopy lighting have not been thoroughly explored. We calibrated and validated an existing functional structural plant model (FSPM), which combines plant morphology with a ray tracing model to estimate light absorption at leaflet level. This FSPM was used to visualize the light environment in a tomato crop illuminated with intra-canopy lighting, top lighting or a combination of both. Model validation of light absorption of individual leaves showed a good fit (R(2) = 0.93) between measured and modelled light absorption of the canopy. Canopy light distribution was then quantified and visualized in three voxel directions by means of average absorbed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and coefficient of variation (CV) within that voxel. Simulations showed that the variation coefficient within horizontal direction was higher for intra-canopy lighting than top lighting (CV=48% versus CV= 43%), while the combination of intra-canopy lighting and top lighting yielded the lowest CV (37%). Combined intra-canopy and top lighting (50/50%) had in all directions a more uniform light absorption than intra-canopy or top lighting alone. The variation was minimal when the ratio of PPFD from intra-canopy to top lighting was about 1, and increased when this ratio increased or decreased. Intra-canopy lighting resulted in 8% higher total light absorption than top lighting, while combining 50% intra-canopy lighting with 50% top lighting, increased light absorption by 4%. Variation in light distribution was further reduced when the intra-canopy LEDs were distributed over strings at four instead of two heights. When positioning LED lamps to illuminate a canopy both total light absorption and light distribution have to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9893118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98931182023-02-03 Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop Schipper, R. van der Meer, M. de Visser, P.H.B. Heuvelink, E. Marcelis, L.F.M. Front Plant Sci Plant Science In the past decade, the potential of positioning LED lamps in between the canopy (intra-canopy) to enhance crop growth and yield has been explored in greenhouse cultivation. Changes in spatial heterogeneity of light absorption that come with the introduction of intra-canopy lighting have not been thoroughly explored. We calibrated and validated an existing functional structural plant model (FSPM), which combines plant morphology with a ray tracing model to estimate light absorption at leaflet level. This FSPM was used to visualize the light environment in a tomato crop illuminated with intra-canopy lighting, top lighting or a combination of both. Model validation of light absorption of individual leaves showed a good fit (R(2) = 0.93) between measured and modelled light absorption of the canopy. Canopy light distribution was then quantified and visualized in three voxel directions by means of average absorbed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and coefficient of variation (CV) within that voxel. Simulations showed that the variation coefficient within horizontal direction was higher for intra-canopy lighting than top lighting (CV=48% versus CV= 43%), while the combination of intra-canopy lighting and top lighting yielded the lowest CV (37%). Combined intra-canopy and top lighting (50/50%) had in all directions a more uniform light absorption than intra-canopy or top lighting alone. The variation was minimal when the ratio of PPFD from intra-canopy to top lighting was about 1, and increased when this ratio increased or decreased. Intra-canopy lighting resulted in 8% higher total light absorption than top lighting, while combining 50% intra-canopy lighting with 50% top lighting, increased light absorption by 4%. Variation in light distribution was further reduced when the intra-canopy LEDs were distributed over strings at four instead of two heights. When positioning LED lamps to illuminate a canopy both total light absorption and light distribution have to be considered. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9893118/ /pubmed/36743509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1012529 Text en Copyright © 2023 Schipper, van der Meer, de Visser, Heuvelink and Marcelis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Schipper, R.
van der Meer, M.
de Visser, P.H.B.
Heuvelink, E.
Marcelis, L.F.M.
Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title_full Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title_fullStr Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title_short Consequences of intra-canopy and top LED lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
title_sort consequences of intra-canopy and top led lighting for uniformity of light distribution in a tomato crop
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1012529
work_keys_str_mv AT schipperr consequencesofintracanopyandtopledlightingforuniformityoflightdistributioninatomatocrop
AT vandermeerm consequencesofintracanopyandtopledlightingforuniformityoflightdistributioninatomatocrop
AT devisserphb consequencesofintracanopyandtopledlightingforuniformityoflightdistributioninatomatocrop
AT heuvelinke consequencesofintracanopyandtopledlightingforuniformityoflightdistributioninatomatocrop
AT marcelislfm consequencesofintracanopyandtopledlightingforuniformityoflightdistributioninatomatocrop