Cargando…
A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey
There seems to be a lack of consistency of maintenance/community-based rehabilitation through long-term care insurance. We aimed to clarify whether consistent rehabilitation can be performed through long-term care insurance by questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000199 |
_version_ | 1784881525655863296 |
---|---|
author | Asaeda, Makoto Mikami, Yukio Nishimura, Yukihide Shimokawa, Toshio Shinohara, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Takashi Kouda, Ken Ogawa, Takahiro Okawa, Hiroyuki Uenishi, Hiroyasu Kuroda, Rumi Mikami, Yasuo Tajima, Fumihiro Kubo, Toshikazu |
author_facet | Asaeda, Makoto Mikami, Yukio Nishimura, Yukihide Shimokawa, Toshio Shinohara, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Takashi Kouda, Ken Ogawa, Takahiro Okawa, Hiroyuki Uenishi, Hiroyasu Kuroda, Rumi Mikami, Yasuo Tajima, Fumihiro Kubo, Toshikazu |
author_sort | Asaeda, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | There seems to be a lack of consistency of maintenance/community-based rehabilitation through long-term care insurance. We aimed to clarify whether consistent rehabilitation can be performed through long-term care insurance by questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study in a nationwide survey among rehabilitation staff and care recipients who completed disease-specific rehabilitation and required maintenance/community-based rehabilitation through long-term care insurance. Consistency of rehabilitation was compared using Fisher’s exact tests. The concordance of the rehabilitation evaluation and treatment conducted under medical and long-term care insurance was assessed using the κ coefficient. RESULTS: Six hundred questionnaires from care recipients and staff were analyzed. Of the rehabilitation staff, 264 (44%) obtained rehabilitation plans from medical institutions. There was a significant difference between the responses of “referral from the same medical corporation” and “obtaining the rehabilitation plan” by Fisher’s exact test (odds ratio: 3.242; P<0.001). Most rehabilitation treatments under medical insurance comprised walking or training with parallel rods/canes [498 patients (83%)], and 454 patients (76%) received stretching and range-of-motion training for the limbs and spine for long-term care insurance. Muscle strength evaluation was the most frequently conducted under medical and long-term care insurance [383 (73%) and 487 (83%), respectively]. The concordance of the evaluation and treatment content, except for disease-specific evaluation, was low (κ coefficient≤0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of provision of rehabilitation plans was low, and evaluation and treatment content under medical and long-term care insurance was inconsistent. Our results draw attention to the need for consistent rehabilitation plans between disease-specific and maintenance/community-based rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9893433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98934332023-02-03 A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey Asaeda, Makoto Mikami, Yukio Nishimura, Yukihide Shimokawa, Toshio Shinohara, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Takashi Kouda, Ken Ogawa, Takahiro Okawa, Hiroyuki Uenishi, Hiroyasu Kuroda, Rumi Mikami, Yasuo Tajima, Fumihiro Kubo, Toshikazu Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research There seems to be a lack of consistency of maintenance/community-based rehabilitation through long-term care insurance. We aimed to clarify whether consistent rehabilitation can be performed through long-term care insurance by questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study in a nationwide survey among rehabilitation staff and care recipients who completed disease-specific rehabilitation and required maintenance/community-based rehabilitation through long-term care insurance. Consistency of rehabilitation was compared using Fisher’s exact tests. The concordance of the rehabilitation evaluation and treatment conducted under medical and long-term care insurance was assessed using the κ coefficient. RESULTS: Six hundred questionnaires from care recipients and staff were analyzed. Of the rehabilitation staff, 264 (44%) obtained rehabilitation plans from medical institutions. There was a significant difference between the responses of “referral from the same medical corporation” and “obtaining the rehabilitation plan” by Fisher’s exact test (odds ratio: 3.242; P<0.001). Most rehabilitation treatments under medical insurance comprised walking or training with parallel rods/canes [498 patients (83%)], and 454 patients (76%) received stretching and range-of-motion training for the limbs and spine for long-term care insurance. Muscle strength evaluation was the most frequently conducted under medical and long-term care insurance [383 (73%) and 487 (83%), respectively]. The concordance of the evaluation and treatment content, except for disease-specific evaluation, was low (κ coefficient≤0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of provision of rehabilitation plans was low, and evaluation and treatment content under medical and long-term care insurance was inconsistent. Our results draw attention to the need for consistent rehabilitation plans between disease-specific and maintenance/community-based rehabilitation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9893433/ /pubmed/36742127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000199 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Asaeda, Makoto Mikami, Yukio Nishimura, Yukihide Shimokawa, Toshio Shinohara, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Takashi Kouda, Ken Ogawa, Takahiro Okawa, Hiroyuki Uenishi, Hiroyasu Kuroda, Rumi Mikami, Yasuo Tajima, Fumihiro Kubo, Toshikazu A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title | A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title_full | A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title_short | A cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in Japan: a questionnaire survey |
title_sort | cross-sectional survey of consistent rehabilitation through long-term care insurance in japan: a questionnaire survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asaedamakoto acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT mikamiyukio acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT nishimurayukihide acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT shimokawatoshio acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT shinoharahiroshi acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kawasakitakashi acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT koudaken acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT ogawatakahiro acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT okawahiroyuki acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT uenishihiroyasu acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kurodarumi acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT mikamiyasuo acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT tajimafumihiro acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kubotoshikazu acrosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT asaedamakoto crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT mikamiyukio crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT nishimurayukihide crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT shimokawatoshio crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT shinoharahiroshi crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kawasakitakashi crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT koudaken crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT ogawatakahiro crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT okawahiroyuki crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT uenishihiroyasu crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kurodarumi crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT mikamiyasuo crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT tajimafumihiro crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey AT kubotoshikazu crosssectionalsurveyofconsistentrehabilitationthroughlongtermcareinsuranceinjapanaquestionnairesurvey |