Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: Data that guide selection of differing anticoagulant regimens for specific cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) against nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) in Chines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yijun, Yang, Dawei, Hou, Dongni, She, Jun, Song, Yuanlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00453-y
_version_ 1784881547366629376
author Song, Yijun
Yang, Dawei
Hou, Dongni
She, Jun
Song, Yuanlin
author_facet Song, Yijun
Yang, Dawei
Hou, Dongni
She, Jun
Song, Yuanlin
author_sort Song, Yijun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data that guide selection of differing anticoagulant regimens for specific cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) against nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) in Chinese lung cancer patients. METHODS: Four hundred forty-six Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk PE who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or LMWH were identified from Zhongshan Hospital database from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcomes were the composite event of VTE recurrence or major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were VTE recurrence, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline covariates. We conducted sensitivity analysis by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analysis by a Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model. RESULTS: In propensity score-matched cohorts, rivaroxaban was similar to LMWH in the risks of the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–1.21; P = 0.22), VTE recurrence (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36–1.34; P = 0.28), major bleeding (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.37–1.68; P = 0.54) and CRNMB (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.62–2.09; P = 0.69). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in rivaroxaban group than LMWH group (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36–0.75; P < 0.001). The primary and secondary outcomes favored rivaroxaban over LMWH in all the subgroups expect for central PE and intermediate-risk PE. The sensitivity analysis yielded similar results, and competing risk analysis was in accordance with the primary findings. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban might be a promising alternative to LMWH as initial treatment for nonhigh-risk PE in lung cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-023-00453-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9893535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98935352023-02-03 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism Song, Yijun Yang, Dawei Hou, Dongni She, Jun Song, Yuanlin Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: Data that guide selection of differing anticoagulant regimens for specific cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) against nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) in Chinese lung cancer patients. METHODS: Four hundred forty-six Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk PE who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or LMWH were identified from Zhongshan Hospital database from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcomes were the composite event of VTE recurrence or major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were VTE recurrence, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline covariates. We conducted sensitivity analysis by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analysis by a Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model. RESULTS: In propensity score-matched cohorts, rivaroxaban was similar to LMWH in the risks of the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–1.21; P = 0.22), VTE recurrence (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36–1.34; P = 0.28), major bleeding (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.37–1.68; P = 0.54) and CRNMB (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.62–2.09; P = 0.69). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in rivaroxaban group than LMWH group (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36–0.75; P < 0.001). The primary and secondary outcomes favored rivaroxaban over LMWH in all the subgroups expect for central PE and intermediate-risk PE. The sensitivity analysis yielded similar results, and competing risk analysis was in accordance with the primary findings. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban might be a promising alternative to LMWH as initial treatment for nonhigh-risk PE in lung cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-023-00453-y. BioMed Central 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9893535/ /pubmed/36732741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00453-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Song, Yijun
Yang, Dawei
Hou, Dongni
She, Jun
Song, Yuanlin
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in Chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and low-molecular-weight heparin in chinese lung cancer patients with nonhigh-risk pulmonary embolism
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00453-y
work_keys_str_mv AT songyijun comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofrivaroxabanandlowmolecularweightheparininchineselungcancerpatientswithnonhighriskpulmonaryembolism
AT yangdawei comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofrivaroxabanandlowmolecularweightheparininchineselungcancerpatientswithnonhighriskpulmonaryembolism
AT houdongni comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofrivaroxabanandlowmolecularweightheparininchineselungcancerpatientswithnonhighriskpulmonaryembolism
AT shejun comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofrivaroxabanandlowmolecularweightheparininchineselungcancerpatientswithnonhighriskpulmonaryembolism
AT songyuanlin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofrivaroxabanandlowmolecularweightheparininchineselungcancerpatientswithnonhighriskpulmonaryembolism