Cargando…

Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Structured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Helena Kyunghee, Banik, Suman, Husain, Muhammad Ishrat, Tang, Victor, Levitan, Robert, Daskalakis, Zafiris J., Kloiber, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z
_version_ 1784881560949882880
author Kim, Helena Kyunghee
Banik, Suman
Husain, Muhammad Ishrat
Tang, Victor
Levitan, Robert
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Kloiber, Stefan
author_facet Kim, Helena Kyunghee
Banik, Suman
Husain, Muhammad Ishrat
Tang, Victor
Levitan, Robert
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Kloiber, Stefan
author_sort Kim, Helena Kyunghee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Structured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated synthesis of SCPs for the treatment of depressive disorders and bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched through June 2022 for peer-reviewed studies examining outcomes of SCPs. Eligibility criteria included being published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language, reporting of intervention used in the SCP, and having quantitative outcomes. Studies Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess quality of RCTs. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies including 15,032 patients were identified for qualitative synthesis. Six studies included patients with BD. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design, outcome measures, and algorithms. More than half of the studies reported superiority of SCPs over treatment as usual, suggesting that the standardized structure and consistent monitoring inherent in SCPs may be contributing to their effectiveness. We also found accumulating evidence supporting feasibility of SCPs in different settings, although dropout rates were generally higher in SCPs. The studies included were limited to being published in peer-reviewed journals in English language. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow quantitative evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest that SCPs are equally or more effective than treatment as usual in depression and BD. Further studies are required to ascertain their effectiveness, particularly for BD, and to identify factors that influence their feasibility and success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9893602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98936022023-02-03 Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder Kim, Helena Kyunghee Banik, Suman Husain, Muhammad Ishrat Tang, Victor Levitan, Robert Daskalakis, Zafiris J. Kloiber, Stefan BMC Psychiatry Review BACKGROUND: Structured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated synthesis of SCPs for the treatment of depressive disorders and bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched through June 2022 for peer-reviewed studies examining outcomes of SCPs. Eligibility criteria included being published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language, reporting of intervention used in the SCP, and having quantitative outcomes. Studies Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess quality of RCTs. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies including 15,032 patients were identified for qualitative synthesis. Six studies included patients with BD. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design, outcome measures, and algorithms. More than half of the studies reported superiority of SCPs over treatment as usual, suggesting that the standardized structure and consistent monitoring inherent in SCPs may be contributing to their effectiveness. We also found accumulating evidence supporting feasibility of SCPs in different settings, although dropout rates were generally higher in SCPs. The studies included were limited to being published in peer-reviewed journals in English language. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow quantitative evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest that SCPs are equally or more effective than treatment as usual in depression and BD. Further studies are required to ascertain their effectiveness, particularly for BD, and to identify factors that influence their feasibility and success. BioMed Central 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9893602/ /pubmed/36732746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Helena Kyunghee
Banik, Suman
Husain, Muhammad Ishrat
Tang, Victor
Levitan, Robert
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Kloiber, Stefan
Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title_full Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title_fullStr Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title_short Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
title_sort systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhelenakyunghee systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT baniksuman systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT husainmuhammadishrat systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT tangvictor systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT levitanrobert systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT daskalakiszafirisj systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder
AT kloiberstefan systematicreviewofstructuredcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderandbipolardisorder