Cargando…

Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival

The rapid increases of the global population and climate change pose major challenges to a sustainable production of food to meet consumer demands. Process-based models (PBMs) have long been used in agricultural crop production for predicting yield and understanding the environmental regulation of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ningyi, Zhou, Xiaohan, Kang, Mengzhen, Hu, Bao-Gang, Heuvelink, Ep, Marcelis, Leo F M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac061
_version_ 1784881616692183040
author Zhang, Ningyi
Zhou, Xiaohan
Kang, Mengzhen
Hu, Bao-Gang
Heuvelink, Ep
Marcelis, Leo F M
author_facet Zhang, Ningyi
Zhou, Xiaohan
Kang, Mengzhen
Hu, Bao-Gang
Heuvelink, Ep
Marcelis, Leo F M
author_sort Zhang, Ningyi
collection PubMed
description The rapid increases of the global population and climate change pose major challenges to a sustainable production of food to meet consumer demands. Process-based models (PBMs) have long been used in agricultural crop production for predicting yield and understanding the environmental regulation of plant physiological processes and its consequences for crop growth and development. In recent years, with the increasing use of sensor and communication technologies for data acquisition in agriculture, machine learning (ML) has become a popular tool in yield prediction (especially on a large scale) and phenotyping. Both PBMs and ML are frequently used in studies on major challenges in crop production and each has its own advantages and drawbacks. We propose to combine PBMs and ML given their intrinsic complementarity, to develop knowledge- and data-driven modelling (KDDM) with high prediction accuracy as well as good interpretability. Parallel, serial and modular structures are three main modes can be adopted to develop KDDM for agricultural applications. The KDDM approach helps to simplify model parameterization by making use of sensor data and improves the accuracy of yield prediction. Furthermore, the KDDM approach has great potential to expand the boundary of current crop models to allow upscaling towards a farm, regional or global level and downscaling to the gene-to-cell level. The KDDM approach is a promising way of combining simulation models in agriculture with the fast developments in data science while mechanisms of many genetic and physiological processes are still under investigation, especially at the nexus of increasing food production, mitigating climate change and achieving sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9893870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98938702023-02-06 Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival Zhang, Ningyi Zhou, Xiaohan Kang, Mengzhen Hu, Bao-Gang Heuvelink, Ep Marcelis, Leo F M AoB Plants Viewpoint The rapid increases of the global population and climate change pose major challenges to a sustainable production of food to meet consumer demands. Process-based models (PBMs) have long been used in agricultural crop production for predicting yield and understanding the environmental regulation of plant physiological processes and its consequences for crop growth and development. In recent years, with the increasing use of sensor and communication technologies for data acquisition in agriculture, machine learning (ML) has become a popular tool in yield prediction (especially on a large scale) and phenotyping. Both PBMs and ML are frequently used in studies on major challenges in crop production and each has its own advantages and drawbacks. We propose to combine PBMs and ML given their intrinsic complementarity, to develop knowledge- and data-driven modelling (KDDM) with high prediction accuracy as well as good interpretability. Parallel, serial and modular structures are three main modes can be adopted to develop KDDM for agricultural applications. The KDDM approach helps to simplify model parameterization by making use of sensor data and improves the accuracy of yield prediction. Furthermore, the KDDM approach has great potential to expand the boundary of current crop models to allow upscaling towards a farm, regional or global level and downscaling to the gene-to-cell level. The KDDM approach is a promising way of combining simulation models in agriculture with the fast developments in data science while mechanisms of many genetic and physiological processes are still under investigation, especially at the nexus of increasing food production, mitigating climate change and achieving sustainability. Oxford University Press 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9893870/ /pubmed/36751366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac061 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Zhang, Ningyi
Zhou, Xiaohan
Kang, Mengzhen
Hu, Bao-Gang
Heuvelink, Ep
Marcelis, Leo F M
Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title_full Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title_fullStr Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title_short Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
title_sort machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9893870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac061
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangningyi machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival
AT zhouxiaohan machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival
AT kangmengzhen machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival
AT hubaogang machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival
AT heuvelinkep machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival
AT marcelisleofm machinelearningversuscropgrowthmodelsanallynotarival