Cargando…
Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic
Autores principales: | Kemp, Luke, Xu, Chi, Depledge, Joanna, Ebi, Kristie L., Gibbins, Goodwin, Kohler, Timothy A., Rockström, Johan, Scheffer, Marten, Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, Steffen, Will, Lenton, Timothy M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217404119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension
por: Kemp, Luke, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reply to Kelman: The foundations for studying catastrophic climate risks
por: Kemp, Luke, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reply to Burgess et al: Catastrophic climate risks are neglected, plausible, and safe to study
por: Kemp, Luke, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios
por: Kemp, Luke, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The vulnerability of aging states: A survival analysis across premodern societies
por: Scheffer, Marten, et al.
Publicado: (2023)