Cargando…

Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks

The functionalities of myoelectric hooks, such as whether they allow wrist movements, as well as the volume and design of the devices, may impact how fitted transradial amputees use their upper limbs. The aim of the current study was to compare two prosthetic myoelectric hooks in terms of compensato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Touillet, Amélie, Billon-Grumillier, Constance, Pierret, Jonathan, Herbe, Pierrick, Martinet, Noël, Loiret, Isabelle, Paysant, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272855
_version_ 1784881751791763456
author Touillet, Amélie
Billon-Grumillier, Constance
Pierret, Jonathan
Herbe, Pierrick
Martinet, Noël
Loiret, Isabelle
Paysant, Jean
author_facet Touillet, Amélie
Billon-Grumillier, Constance
Pierret, Jonathan
Herbe, Pierrick
Martinet, Noël
Loiret, Isabelle
Paysant, Jean
author_sort Touillet, Amélie
collection PubMed
description The functionalities of myoelectric hooks, such as whether they allow wrist movements, as well as the volume and design of the devices, may impact how fitted transradial amputees use their upper limbs. The aim of the current study was to compare two prosthetic myoelectric hooks in terms of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and user satisfaction. This monocentric, randomized, controlled, cross-over trial evaluated eight transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks, the Greifer and the Axon-Hook, during two consecutive periods. At the end of each period, shoulder abduction (mean and percentage of time with shoulder abduction > 60°) and manual dexterity were assessed using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) on both sides, and satisfaction was assessed with the Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. For each patient, data obtained with the BBT on the amputated side were compared with those obtained on the non-amputated side. Shoulder abduction was significantly higher with the Greifer (60.9°± 20.3°, p = 0.03) than with the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°) and also than with the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°, p = 0.02). Shoulder abduction on the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°) was close to that of the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°). The percentage of time spent with shoulder abduction > 60° during the BBT was higher with the Greifer than with the Axon-Hook or with the NA side (53.3 ± 34.4%, 17.6 ± 27.0% and 18.4 ± 34.9%, respectively), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.15). A significant strong negative correlation was found between shoulder abduction and wrist position with the Axon-Hook (r = -0.86; p < 0.01), but not with the Greifer. Manual dexterity and satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two devices. These results revealed compensatory movements, such as shoulder abduction in transradial amputees equipped with hooks, themselves influenced by the prosthetic device settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9894487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98944872023-02-03 Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks Touillet, Amélie Billon-Grumillier, Constance Pierret, Jonathan Herbe, Pierrick Martinet, Noël Loiret, Isabelle Paysant, Jean PLoS One Research Article The functionalities of myoelectric hooks, such as whether they allow wrist movements, as well as the volume and design of the devices, may impact how fitted transradial amputees use their upper limbs. The aim of the current study was to compare two prosthetic myoelectric hooks in terms of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and user satisfaction. This monocentric, randomized, controlled, cross-over trial evaluated eight transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks, the Greifer and the Axon-Hook, during two consecutive periods. At the end of each period, shoulder abduction (mean and percentage of time with shoulder abduction > 60°) and manual dexterity were assessed using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) on both sides, and satisfaction was assessed with the Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. For each patient, data obtained with the BBT on the amputated side were compared with those obtained on the non-amputated side. Shoulder abduction was significantly higher with the Greifer (60.9°± 20.3°, p = 0.03) than with the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°) and also than with the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°, p = 0.02). Shoulder abduction on the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°) was close to that of the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°). The percentage of time spent with shoulder abduction > 60° during the BBT was higher with the Greifer than with the Axon-Hook or with the NA side (53.3 ± 34.4%, 17.6 ± 27.0% and 18.4 ± 34.9%, respectively), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.15). A significant strong negative correlation was found between shoulder abduction and wrist position with the Axon-Hook (r = -0.86; p < 0.01), but not with the Greifer. Manual dexterity and satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two devices. These results revealed compensatory movements, such as shoulder abduction in transradial amputees equipped with hooks, themselves influenced by the prosthetic device settings. Public Library of Science 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9894487/ /pubmed/36730223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272855 Text en © 2023 Touillet et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Touillet, Amélie
Billon-Grumillier, Constance
Pierret, Jonathan
Herbe, Pierrick
Martinet, Noël
Loiret, Isabelle
Paysant, Jean
Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title_full Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title_fullStr Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title_short Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
title_sort comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272855
work_keys_str_mv AT touilletamelie comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT billongrumillierconstance comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT pierretjonathan comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT herbepierrick comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT martinetnoel comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT loiretisabelle comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks
AT paysantjean comparisonofcompensatoryshouldermovementsfunctionalityandsatisfactionintransradialamputeesfittedwithtwoprostheticmyoelectrichooks