Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572 |
_version_ | 1784881752182882304 |
---|---|
author | Schambeck, João Paulo L. Forte, Gabriele C. Gonçalves, Luana M. Stuker, Guilherme Kotlinski, João Bruno F. Tramontin, Giacomo Altmayer, Stephan Watte, Guilherme Hochhegger, Bruno |
author_facet | Schambeck, João Paulo L. Forte, Gabriele C. Gonçalves, Luana M. Stuker, Guilherme Kotlinski, João Bruno F. Tramontin, Giacomo Altmayer, Stephan Watte, Guilherme Hochhegger, Bruno |
author_sort | Schambeck, João Paulo L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in the hepatic fibrosis diagnostic. A meta-analysis was carried out based on articles published until October 2020. The articles are available at following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scientific Electronic Library Online, LILACS, Scopus, and CINAHL. Diagnostic performances were analyzed per METAVIR F2, using 3.5kPa as target fibrosis. Assessment of the methodological quality of the incorporated papers by the QUADAS-2 tool for pSWE and MRE. A total 2,153 studies articles were evaluated and 44 studies, comprising 6,081 patients with individual data, were included in the meta-analysis: 28 studies for pSWE and 16 studies for MRE. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95%CI 0.80–0.90) and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.91), respectively, for pSWE, compared with 0.94 (95%CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.89–0.98) respectively, for MRE. The pooled SROC curve for pSWE shows in the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95%CI 0.90–0.95), whereas the AUC for MRE was 0.98 (95%CI 0.96–0.99). The diagnostic odds ratio for pSWE and MRE were 41 (95%CI 24–72) and 293 (95%CI 86–1000), respectively. There was statistically significant heterogeneity for pSWE sensitivity (I² = 85.26, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 89.46, P<0.001). The heterogeneity for MRE also was significant for sensitivity (I² = 73.28, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 87.24, P<0.001). Therefore, both pSWE and MRE are suitable modalities for assessing liver fibrosis. In addition, MRE is a more accurate imaging technique than pSWE and can be used as alternative to invasive biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9894488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98944882023-02-03 Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis Schambeck, João Paulo L. Forte, Gabriele C. Gonçalves, Luana M. Stuker, Guilherme Kotlinski, João Bruno F. Tramontin, Giacomo Altmayer, Stephan Watte, Guilherme Hochhegger, Bruno PLoS One Research Article The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in the hepatic fibrosis diagnostic. A meta-analysis was carried out based on articles published until October 2020. The articles are available at following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scientific Electronic Library Online, LILACS, Scopus, and CINAHL. Diagnostic performances were analyzed per METAVIR F2, using 3.5kPa as target fibrosis. Assessment of the methodological quality of the incorporated papers by the QUADAS-2 tool for pSWE and MRE. A total 2,153 studies articles were evaluated and 44 studies, comprising 6,081 patients with individual data, were included in the meta-analysis: 28 studies for pSWE and 16 studies for MRE. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95%CI 0.80–0.90) and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.91), respectively, for pSWE, compared with 0.94 (95%CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.89–0.98) respectively, for MRE. The pooled SROC curve for pSWE shows in the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95%CI 0.90–0.95), whereas the AUC for MRE was 0.98 (95%CI 0.96–0.99). The diagnostic odds ratio for pSWE and MRE were 41 (95%CI 24–72) and 293 (95%CI 86–1000), respectively. There was statistically significant heterogeneity for pSWE sensitivity (I² = 85.26, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 89.46, P<0.001). The heterogeneity for MRE also was significant for sensitivity (I² = 73.28, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 87.24, P<0.001). Therefore, both pSWE and MRE are suitable modalities for assessing liver fibrosis. In addition, MRE is a more accurate imaging technique than pSWE and can be used as alternative to invasive biopsy. Public Library of Science 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9894488/ /pubmed/36730265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572 Text en © 2023 Schambeck et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schambeck, João Paulo L. Forte, Gabriele C. Gonçalves, Luana M. Stuker, Guilherme Kotlinski, João Bruno F. Tramontin, Giacomo Altmayer, Stephan Watte, Guilherme Hochhegger, Bruno Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schambeckjoaopaulol diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fortegabrielec diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goncalvesluanam diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stukerguilherme diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kotlinskijoaobrunof diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tramontingiacomo diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT altmayerstephan diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT watteguilherme diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hochheggerbruno diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |