Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schambeck, João Paulo L., Forte, Gabriele C., Gonçalves, Luana M., Stuker, Guilherme, Kotlinski, João Bruno F., Tramontin, Giacomo, Altmayer, Stephan, Watte, Guilherme, Hochhegger, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572
_version_ 1784881752182882304
author Schambeck, João Paulo L.
Forte, Gabriele C.
Gonçalves, Luana M.
Stuker, Guilherme
Kotlinski, João Bruno F.
Tramontin, Giacomo
Altmayer, Stephan
Watte, Guilherme
Hochhegger, Bruno
author_facet Schambeck, João Paulo L.
Forte, Gabriele C.
Gonçalves, Luana M.
Stuker, Guilherme
Kotlinski, João Bruno F.
Tramontin, Giacomo
Altmayer, Stephan
Watte, Guilherme
Hochhegger, Bruno
author_sort Schambeck, João Paulo L.
collection PubMed
description The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in the hepatic fibrosis diagnostic. A meta-analysis was carried out based on articles published until October 2020. The articles are available at following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scientific Electronic Library Online, LILACS, Scopus, and CINAHL. Diagnostic performances were analyzed per METAVIR F2, using 3.5kPa as target fibrosis. Assessment of the methodological quality of the incorporated papers by the QUADAS-2 tool for pSWE and MRE. A total 2,153 studies articles were evaluated and 44 studies, comprising 6,081 patients with individual data, were included in the meta-analysis: 28 studies for pSWE and 16 studies for MRE. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95%CI 0.80–0.90) and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.91), respectively, for pSWE, compared with 0.94 (95%CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.89–0.98) respectively, for MRE. The pooled SROC curve for pSWE shows in the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95%CI 0.90–0.95), whereas the AUC for MRE was 0.98 (95%CI 0.96–0.99). The diagnostic odds ratio for pSWE and MRE were 41 (95%CI 24–72) and 293 (95%CI 86–1000), respectively. There was statistically significant heterogeneity for pSWE sensitivity (I² = 85.26, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 89.46, P<0.001). The heterogeneity for MRE also was significant for sensitivity (I² = 73.28, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 87.24, P<0.001). Therefore, both pSWE and MRE are suitable modalities for assessing liver fibrosis. In addition, MRE is a more accurate imaging technique than pSWE and can be used as alternative to invasive biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9894488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98944882023-02-03 Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis Schambeck, João Paulo L. Forte, Gabriele C. Gonçalves, Luana M. Stuker, Guilherme Kotlinski, João Bruno F. Tramontin, Giacomo Altmayer, Stephan Watte, Guilherme Hochhegger, Bruno PLoS One Research Article The hepatic diseases are extremely common in clinical practice. The correct classification of liver fibrosis is extremely important, as it influences therapy and predicts disease outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in the hepatic fibrosis diagnostic. A meta-analysis was carried out based on articles published until October 2020. The articles are available at following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scientific Electronic Library Online, LILACS, Scopus, and CINAHL. Diagnostic performances were analyzed per METAVIR F2, using 3.5kPa as target fibrosis. Assessment of the methodological quality of the incorporated papers by the QUADAS-2 tool for pSWE and MRE. A total 2,153 studies articles were evaluated and 44 studies, comprising 6,081 patients with individual data, were included in the meta-analysis: 28 studies for pSWE and 16 studies for MRE. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95%CI 0.80–0.90) and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85–0.91), respectively, for pSWE, compared with 0.94 (95%CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.89–0.98) respectively, for MRE. The pooled SROC curve for pSWE shows in the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95%CI 0.90–0.95), whereas the AUC for MRE was 0.98 (95%CI 0.96–0.99). The diagnostic odds ratio for pSWE and MRE were 41 (95%CI 24–72) and 293 (95%CI 86–1000), respectively. There was statistically significant heterogeneity for pSWE sensitivity (I² = 85.26, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 89.46, P<0.001). The heterogeneity for MRE also was significant for sensitivity (I² = 73.28, P<0.001) and specificity (I² = 87.24, P<0.001). Therefore, both pSWE and MRE are suitable modalities for assessing liver fibrosis. In addition, MRE is a more accurate imaging technique than pSWE and can be used as alternative to invasive biopsy. Public Library of Science 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9894488/ /pubmed/36730265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572 Text en © 2023 Schambeck et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schambeck, João Paulo L.
Forte, Gabriele C.
Gonçalves, Luana M.
Stuker, Guilherme
Kotlinski, João Bruno F.
Tramontin, Giacomo
Altmayer, Stephan
Watte, Guilherme
Hochhegger, Bruno
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271572
work_keys_str_mv AT schambeckjoaopaulol diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fortegabrielec diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goncalvesluanam diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stukerguilherme diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kotlinskijoaobrunof diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tramontingiacomo diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT altmayerstephan diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT watteguilherme diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hochheggerbruno diagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandpointshearwaveelastographyforsignificanthepaticfibrosisscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis