Cargando…

Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Calculation of percentage hearing loss (pHV) from the pure-tune audiogram according to Röser in 1973 or from the speech audiogram according to Boenninghaus and Röser in 1973 is a method still applied for quantitative assessment of hearing. However, this is not common for the evaluation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dziemba, Oliver C., Brzoska, Tina, Ihler, Friedrich, Busch, Chia-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36592183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-022-01257-8
_version_ 1784881848808112128
author Dziemba, Oliver C.
Brzoska, Tina
Ihler, Friedrich
Busch, Chia-Jung
author_facet Dziemba, Oliver C.
Brzoska, Tina
Ihler, Friedrich
Busch, Chia-Jung
author_sort Dziemba, Oliver C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Calculation of percentage hearing loss (pHV) from the pure-tune audiogram according to Röser in 1973 or from the speech audiogram according to Boenninghaus and Röser in 1973 is a method still applied for quantitative assessment of hearing. However, this is not common for the evaluation of postoperative results of implantable hearing systems. During the regular work-up after cochlear implantation (CI) in Germany, all necessary parameters are available for calculation of pHV either from categorical loudness scaling (pHV(KLS)) or speech-recognition threshold (pHV(FB)). OBJECTIVE: The parameters pHV(KLS) and pHV(FB) are introduced and calculated from data available from clinical routine. Their potential applicability for assessment of the result of CI is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study comprises retrospective chart review of audiological parameters from 66 CI procedures in one tertiary referral center. pHV(KLS) was calculated from the equal loudness curve 5 CU, pHV(FB) from the Freiburg speech test in free field. RESULTS: While pHV(KLS) shows small variation, the variation in pHV(FB) is initially larger but decreases over time. Furthermore, starting from initial fitting, the mean pHV shows convergence over time. The difference between pHV(FB) and pHV(KLS) is positive and statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It is possible to calculate pHV(KLS) and pHV(FB) from routine data. A correlation of the difference between pHV(FB) and pHV(KLS) with successful CI performance seems plausible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9894973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98949732023-02-04 Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation Dziemba, Oliver C. Brzoska, Tina Ihler, Friedrich Busch, Chia-Jung HNO Originalien BACKGROUND: Calculation of percentage hearing loss (pHV) from the pure-tune audiogram according to Röser in 1973 or from the speech audiogram according to Boenninghaus and Röser in 1973 is a method still applied for quantitative assessment of hearing. However, this is not common for the evaluation of postoperative results of implantable hearing systems. During the regular work-up after cochlear implantation (CI) in Germany, all necessary parameters are available for calculation of pHV either from categorical loudness scaling (pHV(KLS)) or speech-recognition threshold (pHV(FB)). OBJECTIVE: The parameters pHV(KLS) and pHV(FB) are introduced and calculated from data available from clinical routine. Their potential applicability for assessment of the result of CI is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study comprises retrospective chart review of audiological parameters from 66 CI procedures in one tertiary referral center. pHV(KLS) was calculated from the equal loudness curve 5 CU, pHV(FB) from the Freiburg speech test in free field. RESULTS: While pHV(KLS) shows small variation, the variation in pHV(FB) is initially larger but decreases over time. Furthermore, starting from initial fitting, the mean pHV shows convergence over time. The difference between pHV(FB) and pHV(KLS) is positive and statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It is possible to calculate pHV(KLS) and pHV(FB) from routine data. A correlation of the difference between pHV(FB) and pHV(KLS) with successful CI performance seems plausible. Springer Medizin 2023-01-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9894973/ /pubmed/36592183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-022-01257-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Dziemba, Oliver C.
Brzoska, Tina
Ihler, Friedrich
Busch, Chia-Jung
Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title_full Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title_short Eignung der Bestimmung prozentualer Hörverluste zum Monitoring der Cochlea Implantat Rehabilitation
title_sort eignung der bestimmung prozentualer hörverluste zum monitoring der cochlea implantat rehabilitation
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36592183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-022-01257-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dziembaoliverc eignungderbestimmungprozentualerhorverlustezummonitoringdercochleaimplantatrehabilitation
AT brzoskatina eignungderbestimmungprozentualerhorverlustezummonitoringdercochleaimplantatrehabilitation
AT ihlerfriedrich eignungderbestimmungprozentualerhorverlustezummonitoringdercochleaimplantatrehabilitation
AT buschchiajung eignungderbestimmungprozentualerhorverlustezummonitoringdercochleaimplantatrehabilitation