Cargando…

Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different starting doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) on pregnancy outcomes for patients with normal ovarian reserve during gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol-controlled ovarian stimulation of in vitro fertilization (IVF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Zhi-cheng, Li, Yong-qian, Li, Ran, Hou, Sen, Xia, Qing-chang, Yang, Kai, Wang, Pei-xuan, Li, Shu-miao, Sun, Zhen-gao, Guo, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1068141
_version_ 1784881874478301184
author Jia, Zhi-cheng
Li, Yong-qian
Li, Ran
Hou, Sen
Xia, Qing-chang
Yang, Kai
Wang, Pei-xuan
Li, Shu-miao
Sun, Zhen-gao
Guo, Ying
author_facet Jia, Zhi-cheng
Li, Yong-qian
Li, Ran
Hou, Sen
Xia, Qing-chang
Yang, Kai
Wang, Pei-xuan
Li, Shu-miao
Sun, Zhen-gao
Guo, Ying
author_sort Jia, Zhi-cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different starting doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) on pregnancy outcomes for patients with normal ovarian reserve during gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol-controlled ovarian stimulation of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 1138 patients undergoing IVF cycles following the GnRH-ant protocol were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the starting dose of rhFSH. 617 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU, and 521 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU. We compared demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation and embryological characteristics, and pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the possible effects of the known potential confounding factors on pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly lower than those in the 225 IU rhFSH group. There was no significant difference between the two groups referring to embryological characteristics. The proportion of fresh embryo transfer in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly higher than that in the 225 IU rhFSH group (48.30% vs. 40.90%), and there was no difference in the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU for ovarian stimulation has a similar pregnancy outcome as starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU in GnRH-ant protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve. Considering the potential cost-effectiveness and shorter time to live birth, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU may be more suitable than 225 IU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9895085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98950852023-02-04 Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve Jia, Zhi-cheng Li, Yong-qian Li, Ran Hou, Sen Xia, Qing-chang Yang, Kai Wang, Pei-xuan Li, Shu-miao Sun, Zhen-gao Guo, Ying Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different starting doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) on pregnancy outcomes for patients with normal ovarian reserve during gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol-controlled ovarian stimulation of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 1138 patients undergoing IVF cycles following the GnRH-ant protocol were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the starting dose of rhFSH. 617 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU, and 521 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU. We compared demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation and embryological characteristics, and pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the possible effects of the known potential confounding factors on pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly lower than those in the 225 IU rhFSH group. There was no significant difference between the two groups referring to embryological characteristics. The proportion of fresh embryo transfer in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly higher than that in the 225 IU rhFSH group (48.30% vs. 40.90%), and there was no difference in the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU for ovarian stimulation has a similar pregnancy outcome as starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU in GnRH-ant protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve. Considering the potential cost-effectiveness and shorter time to live birth, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU may be more suitable than 225 IU. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9895085/ /pubmed/36742378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1068141 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jia, Li, Li, Hou, Xia, Yang, Wang, Li, Sun and Guo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Jia, Zhi-cheng
Li, Yong-qian
Li, Ran
Hou, Sen
Xia, Qing-chang
Yang, Kai
Wang, Pei-xuan
Li, Shu-miao
Sun, Zhen-gao
Guo, Ying
Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title_full Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title_fullStr Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title_short Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
title_sort comparison of two different starting dose of rhfsh in gnrh antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36742378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1068141
work_keys_str_mv AT jiazhicheng comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT liyongqian comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT liran comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT housen comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT xiaqingchang comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT yangkai comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT wangpeixuan comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT lishumiao comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT sunzhengao comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve
AT guoying comparisonoftwodifferentstartingdoseofrhfshingnrhantagonistprotocolforpatientswithnormalovarianreserve