Cargando…
The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background There is a lack of evidence-based practice regarding the duration of pressure pack placement following tooth extraction. This study aimed to compare the incidence of post-extraction bleeding following 60 minutes versus 10 minutes of pressure pack placement. Methodology A randomized contro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33331 |
_version_ | 1784881884791046144 |
---|---|
author | Yerragudi, Navaneeth Chawla, Jitendra G Kalidoss, Vinoth K Polineni, Swapnika Jayam, Cheranjeevi Kumar, Chaitanya |
author_facet | Yerragudi, Navaneeth Chawla, Jitendra G Kalidoss, Vinoth K Polineni, Swapnika Jayam, Cheranjeevi Kumar, Chaitanya |
author_sort | Yerragudi, Navaneeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background There is a lack of evidence-based practice regarding the duration of pressure pack placement following tooth extraction. This study aimed to compare the incidence of post-extraction bleeding following 60 minutes versus 10 minutes of pressure pack placement. Methodology A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included patients requiring intra-alveolar tooth extractions. Patients were randomly allocated into the experimental group or control group by a permuted block randomization method. A blinded observer noted the incidence of post-extraction bleeding. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage. The chi-square test was used for intergroup statistical analysis. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results There were 528 participants, 264 of whom were allocated to each group. The incidence of post-extraction bleeding was 8% and 6.8% in the experimental and control groups, respectively. On bivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.618; relative risk with 95% confidence interval = 1.0). Conclusions In the majority of cases, hemostasis was achieved in 10 minutes. Therefore, removing the pressure pack after 10 minutes may be advised to ensure hemostasis and, ultimately, save chairside time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9895223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98952232023-02-03 The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Yerragudi, Navaneeth Chawla, Jitendra G Kalidoss, Vinoth K Polineni, Swapnika Jayam, Cheranjeevi Kumar, Chaitanya Cureus Dentistry Background There is a lack of evidence-based practice regarding the duration of pressure pack placement following tooth extraction. This study aimed to compare the incidence of post-extraction bleeding following 60 minutes versus 10 minutes of pressure pack placement. Methodology A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included patients requiring intra-alveolar tooth extractions. Patients were randomly allocated into the experimental group or control group by a permuted block randomization method. A blinded observer noted the incidence of post-extraction bleeding. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage. The chi-square test was used for intergroup statistical analysis. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results There were 528 participants, 264 of whom were allocated to each group. The incidence of post-extraction bleeding was 8% and 6.8% in the experimental and control groups, respectively. On bivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.618; relative risk with 95% confidence interval = 1.0). Conclusions In the majority of cases, hemostasis was achieved in 10 minutes. Therefore, removing the pressure pack after 10 minutes may be advised to ensure hemostasis and, ultimately, save chairside time. Cureus 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9895223/ /pubmed/36741661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33331 Text en Copyright © 2023, Yerragudi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dentistry Yerragudi, Navaneeth Chawla, Jitendra G Kalidoss, Vinoth K Polineni, Swapnika Jayam, Cheranjeevi Kumar, Chaitanya The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | The Optimal Hemostasis Duration After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | optimal hemostasis duration after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Dentistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yerragudinavaneeth theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chawlajitendrag theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kalidossvinothk theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polineniswapnika theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jayamcheranjeevi theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kumarchaitanya theoptimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yerragudinavaneeth optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chawlajitendrag optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kalidossvinothk optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polineniswapnika optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jayamcheranjeevi optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kumarchaitanya optimalhemostasisdurationaftertoothextractionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |