Cargando…

Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on postoperative complications and lung function in patients with lung cancer compared to usual care. METHODS: We searched electronic databases in April 2022, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zihao, Jia, Junqiang, Gui, Dongmei, Liu, Feng, Li, Jun, Tu, Jiayuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1029738
_version_ 1784881916322775040
author Chen, Zihao
Jia, Junqiang
Gui, Dongmei
Liu, Feng
Li, Jun
Tu, Jiayuan
author_facet Chen, Zihao
Jia, Junqiang
Gui, Dongmei
Liu, Feng
Li, Jun
Tu, Jiayuan
author_sort Chen, Zihao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on postoperative complications and lung function in patients with lung cancer compared to usual care. METHODS: We searched electronic databases in April 2022, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Two authors independently applied the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of RCTs. The postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and cardiopulmonary functions from the studies were pooled for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion and were conducted in the meta-analysis. HIIT significantly increased VO(2peak) (MD = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.70 to 3.60; I(2) = 40%; P <0.001) and FEV1 (MD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.20; I(2) = 51%; P = 0.003) compared with usual care. A subgroup analysis of studies that applied HIIT perioperatively showed significant improvement of HIIT on FEV1 (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.20; I(2) = 36%; P <0.0001). HIIT significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atelectasis in lung cancer patients compared with usual care (RD = −0.16; 95% CI = −0.24 to −0.08; I(2) = 24%; P <0.0001). There was no statistically significant effect of HIIT on postoperative arrhythmias (RD = −0.05; 95% CI = −0.13 to 0.03; I(2) = 40%; P = 0.22), length of hospitalization (MD = −1.64; 95% CI = −3.29 to 0.01; P = 0.05), and the six-minute walk test (MD = 19.77; 95% CI = −15.25 to 54.80; P = 0.27) compared to usual care. CONCLUSION: HIIT may enhance VO(2peak) and FEV1 in lung cancer patients and reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. However, HIIT may not reduce the incidence of postoperative arrhythmia, shorten the length of hospitalization, or improve the exercise performance of patients with lung cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022335441
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9895778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98957782023-02-04 Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Zihao Jia, Junqiang Gui, Dongmei Liu, Feng Li, Jun Tu, Jiayuan Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on postoperative complications and lung function in patients with lung cancer compared to usual care. METHODS: We searched electronic databases in April 2022, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Two authors independently applied the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of RCTs. The postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and cardiopulmonary functions from the studies were pooled for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion and were conducted in the meta-analysis. HIIT significantly increased VO(2peak) (MD = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.70 to 3.60; I(2) = 40%; P <0.001) and FEV1 (MD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.20; I(2) = 51%; P = 0.003) compared with usual care. A subgroup analysis of studies that applied HIIT perioperatively showed significant improvement of HIIT on FEV1 (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.20; I(2) = 36%; P <0.0001). HIIT significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atelectasis in lung cancer patients compared with usual care (RD = −0.16; 95% CI = −0.24 to −0.08; I(2) = 24%; P <0.0001). There was no statistically significant effect of HIIT on postoperative arrhythmias (RD = −0.05; 95% CI = −0.13 to 0.03; I(2) = 40%; P = 0.22), length of hospitalization (MD = −1.64; 95% CI = −3.29 to 0.01; P = 0.05), and the six-minute walk test (MD = 19.77; 95% CI = −15.25 to 54.80; P = 0.27) compared to usual care. CONCLUSION: HIIT may enhance VO(2peak) and FEV1 in lung cancer patients and reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. However, HIIT may not reduce the incidence of postoperative arrhythmia, shorten the length of hospitalization, or improve the exercise performance of patients with lung cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022335441 Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9895778/ /pubmed/36741720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1029738 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Jia, Gui, Liu, Li and Tu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Zihao
Jia, Junqiang
Gui, Dongmei
Liu, Feng
Li, Jun
Tu, Jiayuan
Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort functional and postoperative outcomes after high-intensity interval training in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1029738
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzihao functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiajunqiang functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guidongmei functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liufeng functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijun functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tujiayuan functionalandpostoperativeoutcomesafterhighintensityintervaltraininginlungcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis