Cargando…
Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576 |
_version_ | 1784882015780208640 |
---|---|
author | Mainzer, Rheanna Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Nguyen, Cattram Simpson, Julie Carlin, John Lee, Katherine |
author_facet | Mainzer, Rheanna Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Nguyen, Cattram Simpson, Julie Carlin, John Lee, Katherine |
author_sort | Mainzer, Rheanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing data as missing completely at random, missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random does not allow for a clear assessment of missingness assumptions when missingness arises in more than one variable. This presents challenges for selecting an analytic approach and determining when a sensitivity analysis under plausible alternative missing data assumptions is required. This is particularly pertinent with multiple imputation (MI), which is often justified by assuming data are MAR. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the use of MI in observational studies that address causal questions, with a focus on if and how (a) missingness assumptions are expressed and assessed, (b) missingness assumptions are used to justify the choice of a complete case analysis and/or MI for handling missing data and (c) sensitivity analyses under alternative plausible assumptions about the missingness mechanism are conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will review observational studies that aim to answer causal questions and use MI, published between January 2019 and December 2021 in five top general epidemiology journals. Studies will be identified using a full text search for the term ‘multiple imputation’ and then assessed for eligibility. Information extracted will include details about the study characteristics, missing data, missingness assumptions and MI implementation. Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review because data will be collected only from published studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20010497.v1). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9896184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98961842023-02-04 Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review Mainzer, Rheanna Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Nguyen, Cattram Simpson, Julie Carlin, John Lee, Katherine BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing data as missing completely at random, missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random does not allow for a clear assessment of missingness assumptions when missingness arises in more than one variable. This presents challenges for selecting an analytic approach and determining when a sensitivity analysis under plausible alternative missing data assumptions is required. This is particularly pertinent with multiple imputation (MI), which is often justified by assuming data are MAR. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the use of MI in observational studies that address causal questions, with a focus on if and how (a) missingness assumptions are expressed and assessed, (b) missingness assumptions are used to justify the choice of a complete case analysis and/or MI for handling missing data and (c) sensitivity analyses under alternative plausible assumptions about the missingness mechanism are conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will review observational studies that aim to answer causal questions and use MI, published between January 2019 and December 2021 in five top general epidemiology journals. Studies will be identified using a full text search for the term ‘multiple imputation’ and then assessed for eligibility. Information extracted will include details about the study characteristics, missing data, missingness assumptions and MI implementation. Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review because data will be collected only from published studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20010497.v1). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9896184/ /pubmed/36725096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Mainzer, Rheanna Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Nguyen, Cattram Simpson, Julie Carlin, John Lee, Katherine Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title | Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full | Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title_short | Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
title_sort | handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mainzerrheanna handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview AT morenobetancurmargarita handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview AT nguyencattram handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview AT simpsonjulie handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview AT carlinjohn handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview AT leekatherine handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview |