Cargando…

Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mainzer, Rheanna, Moreno-Betancur, Margarita, Nguyen, Cattram, Simpson, Julie, Carlin, John, Lee, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576
_version_ 1784882015780208640
author Mainzer, Rheanna
Moreno-Betancur, Margarita
Nguyen, Cattram
Simpson, Julie
Carlin, John
Lee, Katherine
author_facet Mainzer, Rheanna
Moreno-Betancur, Margarita
Nguyen, Cattram
Simpson, Julie
Carlin, John
Lee, Katherine
author_sort Mainzer, Rheanna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing data as missing completely at random, missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random does not allow for a clear assessment of missingness assumptions when missingness arises in more than one variable. This presents challenges for selecting an analytic approach and determining when a sensitivity analysis under plausible alternative missing data assumptions is required. This is particularly pertinent with multiple imputation (MI), which is often justified by assuming data are MAR. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the use of MI in observational studies that address causal questions, with a focus on if and how (a) missingness assumptions are expressed and assessed, (b) missingness assumptions are used to justify the choice of a complete case analysis and/or MI for handling missing data and (c) sensitivity analyses under alternative plausible assumptions about the missingness mechanism are conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will review observational studies that aim to answer causal questions and use MI, published between January 2019 and December 2021 in five top general epidemiology journals. Studies will be identified using a full text search for the term ‘multiple imputation’ and then assessed for eligibility. Information extracted will include details about the study characteristics, missing data, missingness assumptions and MI implementation. Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review because data will be collected only from published studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20010497.v1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9896184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98961842023-02-04 Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review Mainzer, Rheanna Moreno-Betancur, Margarita Nguyen, Cattram Simpson, Julie Carlin, John Lee, Katherine BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Observational studies in health-related research often aim to answer causal questions. Missing data are common in these studies and often occur in multiple variables, such as the exposure, outcome and/or variables used to control for confounding. The standard classification of missing data as missing completely at random, missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random does not allow for a clear assessment of missingness assumptions when missingness arises in more than one variable. This presents challenges for selecting an analytic approach and determining when a sensitivity analysis under plausible alternative missing data assumptions is required. This is particularly pertinent with multiple imputation (MI), which is often justified by assuming data are MAR. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the use of MI in observational studies that address causal questions, with a focus on if and how (a) missingness assumptions are expressed and assessed, (b) missingness assumptions are used to justify the choice of a complete case analysis and/or MI for handling missing data and (c) sensitivity analyses under alternative plausible assumptions about the missingness mechanism are conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will review observational studies that aim to answer causal questions and use MI, published between January 2019 and December 2021 in five top general epidemiology journals. Studies will be identified using a full text search for the term ‘multiple imputation’ and then assessed for eligibility. Information extracted will include details about the study characteristics, missing data, missingness assumptions and MI implementation. Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review because data will be collected only from published studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20010497.v1). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9896184/ /pubmed/36725096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Mainzer, Rheanna
Moreno-Betancur, Margarita
Nguyen, Cattram
Simpson, Julie
Carlin, John
Lee, Katherine
Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065576
work_keys_str_mv AT mainzerrheanna handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT morenobetancurmargarita handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT nguyencattram handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT simpsonjulie handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT carlinjohn handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT leekatherine handlingofmissingdatawithmultipleimputationinobservationalstudiesthataddresscausalquestionsprotocolforascopingreview