An analysis of emergency surgery on coronavirus disease positive patients and their outcomes during the coronavirus pandemic: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine the outcome of emergency surgery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with regard to presently existing physical status, and highlight its subspecialty distribution. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was done on all patients who underwent emergency surgery between March 2020 and Dec 2021 and were positive for COVID-19. Data collection included the age of the patients, gender, diagnosis, the type of surgery performed, and outcome. Physical status was assessed, as per Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MMRC) and Metabolic Equivalent Scale (METS). RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were analyzed from March 2020 to Dec 2021. There were 63 females and 26 males. The average age of the males was 53.8 ± 8.9 years and the average age of the females was 29.1 ± 4.6 years. The maximum number of surgeries done was lower segment cesarean section (57.3%). 55 out of 60 (91%) cases had a good grade on the MMRC scale (Grade 0 and 1). 3 patients had Grade 4 MMRC scale and all 3 were oncology cases. As per the METS scale, 56/60 (93.3%) patients had METS >10. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that 55 out of 60 (91%) of cases had a good grade on the MMRC scale (Grade 0 and 1) 6 months to 1-year post-surgery. As per the METS scale, 56/60 (93.3%) patients had METS >10. Most of the cases were asymptomatic COVID-19-positive and presently have good physical status as determined by the study.