Cargando…

Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?

The management of sepsis requires the rapid administration of fluid to support blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Guidelines suggest that patients should receive 30 ml per kg of fluid over the first one to three hours of management. The next concern is to determine which patients need additional f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nugent, Kenneth, Berdine, Gilbert, Pena, Camilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220304202556
_version_ 1784882047625461760
author Nugent, Kenneth
Berdine, Gilbert
Pena, Camilo
author_facet Nugent, Kenneth
Berdine, Gilbert
Pena, Camilo
author_sort Nugent, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description The management of sepsis requires the rapid administration of fluid to support blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Guidelines suggest that patients should receive 30 ml per kg of fluid over the first one to three hours of management. The next concern is to determine which patients need additional fluid. This introduces the concept of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase in cardiac output following the administration of a fluid bolus. Dynamic tests, measuring cardiac output, identify fluid responders better than static tests. Passive leg raising tests provide an alternative approach to determine fluid responsiveness without administering fluid. However, one small randomized trial demonstrated that patients managed with frequent passive leg raising tests had a smaller net fluid balance at 72 hours and reduced requirements for renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation, but no change in mortality. A meta-analysis including 4 randomized control trials reported that resuscitation guided by fluid responsiveness does not improve mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis. Recent studies have demonstrated that the early administration of norepinephrine may improve outcomes in patients with sepsis. The concept of fluid responsiveness helps clinicians analyze the clinical status of patients, but this information must be integrated into the overall management of the patient. This review considers the use and benefit of fluid responsiveness tests to direct fluid administration in patients with sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9896423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98964232023-11-02 Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis? Nugent, Kenneth Berdine, Gilbert Pena, Camilo Curr Cardiol Rev Cardiology The management of sepsis requires the rapid administration of fluid to support blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Guidelines suggest that patients should receive 30 ml per kg of fluid over the first one to three hours of management. The next concern is to determine which patients need additional fluid. This introduces the concept of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase in cardiac output following the administration of a fluid bolus. Dynamic tests, measuring cardiac output, identify fluid responders better than static tests. Passive leg raising tests provide an alternative approach to determine fluid responsiveness without administering fluid. However, one small randomized trial demonstrated that patients managed with frequent passive leg raising tests had a smaller net fluid balance at 72 hours and reduced requirements for renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation, but no change in mortality. A meta-analysis including 4 randomized control trials reported that resuscitation guided by fluid responsiveness does not improve mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis. Recent studies have demonstrated that the early administration of norepinephrine may improve outcomes in patients with sepsis. The concept of fluid responsiveness helps clinicians analyze the clinical status of patients, but this information must be integrated into the overall management of the patient. This review considers the use and benefit of fluid responsiveness tests to direct fluid administration in patients with sepsis. Bentham Science Publishers 2022-09-16 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9896423/ /pubmed/35249497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220304202556 Text en © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Nugent, Kenneth
Berdine, Gilbert
Pena, Camilo
Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title_full Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title_fullStr Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title_full_unstemmed Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title_short Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?
title_sort does fluid administration based on fluid responsiveness tests such as passive leg raising improve outcomes in sepsis?
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220304202556
work_keys_str_mv AT nugentkenneth doesfluidadministrationbasedonfluidresponsivenesstestssuchaspassivelegraisingimproveoutcomesinsepsis
AT berdinegilbert doesfluidadministrationbasedonfluidresponsivenesstestssuchaspassivelegraisingimproveoutcomesinsepsis
AT penacamilo doesfluidadministrationbasedonfluidresponsivenesstestssuchaspassivelegraisingimproveoutcomesinsepsis