Long-Arm Splinting Versus Above-Elbow Casting for Type 1 Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Type 1 supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures tend to heal well when immobilized by above-elbow casting or long-arm splinting. There is no consensus as to whether one treatment method is more effective than the other for this injury. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic and functional outcomes of long-arm splinting and above-elbow casting as the definitive treatment for children with type 1 SCH fractures. The study was set up as a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Patients between three and 12 years old presenting with a type 1 SCH fracture were randomized into splint or cast groups, or an observational arm. Baumann’s angle, functional assessment scores, and Flynn’s criteria score were measured at initial injury and at six months post-injury. In total, 34 patients were enrolled in the study with 13 in the randomized arm and 21 in the observational arm. Due to lack of follow-up data at 6 months post-injury, five splint patients and 10 cast patients were included in the final cohort for data analysis. The average change in Baumann’s angle at 6-month follow-up was 3° or less for each treatment arm. The splint group obtained excellent Flynn’s criteria scores while the cast group reported good and excellent scores. Complications reported in the splint group included device breakdown, a conversion to above-arm cast, and significant itchiness. Preliminary findings suggest functional and radiological outcomes with splinting are non-inferior to casting; however, a larger sample size is required to more accurately compare the two modalities. This study was registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT01912365).