BRAF(V600E) mutational status assessment in cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms in a group of the Egyptian population

BACKGROUND: Melanocytic neoplasms range from banal nevi to malignant melanomas. The genetic background has been extensively studied in the Caucasian population. BRAF mutations were reported among the early driver mutations in nevogenesis. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis in the Egyptian population has not been elucidated. AIM AND METHODS: The present study was carried out to assess the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the RM-08 clone in reference to allele-specific real-time PCR (CAST-PCR) for the detection of the BRAF (V600E) mutation in 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of melanocytic neoplasms with prior bleaching using hydrogen peroxide in Tris-HCL and Bovine Serum Albumin respectively. RESULTS: IHC staining was interpreted using staining reaction (positive versus negative) and staining pattern (negative and heterogeneous versus homogenous). Using the staining pattern, the specificity increased from 73.3 to 88.2%, the negative predictive value increased from 73.3 to 100%, the diagnostic accuracy increased from 71.4 to 90.48% and the overall accuracy increased from 69.9 to 77.3%. The sensitivity and positive predictive value remained unchanged. The K-agreement coefficient increased from 0.364 (fair agreement) to 0.741 (good agreement) and was statistically significant (p = 0.00). Next-generation sequencing was performed in 11 cases, 8 cases with IHC-positive and BRAF (wild type) in addition to 3 cases that failed PCR analysis and revealed no BRAF (V600E). No statistically significant difference was found in the clinicopathological parameters between BRAF (V600E) and BRAF (wild−type) melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that IHC staining homogeneity may be more accurate in predicting BRAF (V600E) mutational status. However, IHC cannot replace molecular methods.