Cargando…

Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways

BACKGROUND: Ovarian granulosa cells (GC) are essential for the development and maturation of a proper oocyte. GC are sensitive to endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogue bisphenol S (BPS), plasticisers present in everyday consumer products. BPA exhibits greater binding aff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Téteau, Ophélie, Vitorino Carvalho, Anaïs, Papillier, Pascal, Mandon-Pépin, Béatrice, Jouneau, Luc, Jarrier-Gaillard, Peggy, Desmarchais, Alice, Lebachelier de la Riviere, Marie-Emilie, Vignault, Claire, Maillard, Virginie, Binet, Aurélien, Uzbekova, Svetlana, Elis, Sebastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01114-4
_version_ 1784882112326795264
author Téteau, Ophélie
Vitorino Carvalho, Anaïs
Papillier, Pascal
Mandon-Pépin, Béatrice
Jouneau, Luc
Jarrier-Gaillard, Peggy
Desmarchais, Alice
Lebachelier de la Riviere, Marie-Emilie
Vignault, Claire
Maillard, Virginie
Binet, Aurélien
Uzbekova, Svetlana
Elis, Sebastien
author_facet Téteau, Ophélie
Vitorino Carvalho, Anaïs
Papillier, Pascal
Mandon-Pépin, Béatrice
Jouneau, Luc
Jarrier-Gaillard, Peggy
Desmarchais, Alice
Lebachelier de la Riviere, Marie-Emilie
Vignault, Claire
Maillard, Virginie
Binet, Aurélien
Uzbekova, Svetlana
Elis, Sebastien
author_sort Téteau, Ophélie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovarian granulosa cells (GC) are essential for the development and maturation of a proper oocyte. GC are sensitive to endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogue bisphenol S (BPS), plasticisers present in everyday consumer products. BPA exhibits greater binding affinity for the membrane oestrogen receptor (GPER) than for the nuclear oestrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ). Here, we analysed the effects of BPA and BPS on the steroidogenesis of ovine GC in vitro, as well as their early mechanisms of action, the ovine being a relevant model to study human reproductive impairment. Disruption of GC steroidogenesis might alter oocyte quality and consequently fertility rate. In addition, we compared the effects of a specific GPER agonist (G-1) and antagonist (G-15) to those of BPA and BPS. Ewe GC were cultured with BPA or BPS (10 or 50 µM) or G-1 (1 µM) and/or G-15 (10 µM) for 48 h to study steroidogenesis. RESULTS: Both BPA and BPS (10 µM) altered the secretion of progesterone, however, only BPS (10 µM) affected oestradiol secretion. RNA-seq was performed on GC after 1 h of culture with BPA or BPS (50 µM) or G-1 (10 µM), followed by real-time PCR analyses of differentially expressed genes after 12, 24 and 48 h of culture. The absence of induced GPER target genes showed that BPA and BPS did not activate GPER in GC after 1 h of treatment. These molecules exhibited mainly independent early mechanisms of action. Gene ontology analysis showed that after 1 h of treatment, BPA mainly disrupted the expression of the genes involved in metabolism and transcription, while BPS had a smaller effect and impaired cellular communications. BPA had a transient effect on the expression of CHAC1 (NOTCH signalling and oxidative balance), JUN (linked to MAPK pathway), NR4A1 (oestradiol secretion inhibition), ARRDC4 (endocytose of GPCR) and KLF10 (cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis), while expression changes were maintained over time for the genes LSMEM1 (linked to MAPK pathway), TXNIP (oxidative stress) and LIF (cell cycle regulation) after 12 and 48 h, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, although they exhibited similar effects, BPA and BPS impaired different molecular pathways in GC in vitro. New investigations will be necessary to follow the temporal changes of these genes over time, as well as the biological processes involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-023-01114-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9896735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98967352023-02-04 Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways Téteau, Ophélie Vitorino Carvalho, Anaïs Papillier, Pascal Mandon-Pépin, Béatrice Jouneau, Luc Jarrier-Gaillard, Peggy Desmarchais, Alice Lebachelier de la Riviere, Marie-Emilie Vignault, Claire Maillard, Virginie Binet, Aurélien Uzbekova, Svetlana Elis, Sebastien J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Ovarian granulosa cells (GC) are essential for the development and maturation of a proper oocyte. GC are sensitive to endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogue bisphenol S (BPS), plasticisers present in everyday consumer products. BPA exhibits greater binding affinity for the membrane oestrogen receptor (GPER) than for the nuclear oestrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ). Here, we analysed the effects of BPA and BPS on the steroidogenesis of ovine GC in vitro, as well as their early mechanisms of action, the ovine being a relevant model to study human reproductive impairment. Disruption of GC steroidogenesis might alter oocyte quality and consequently fertility rate. In addition, we compared the effects of a specific GPER agonist (G-1) and antagonist (G-15) to those of BPA and BPS. Ewe GC were cultured with BPA or BPS (10 or 50 µM) or G-1 (1 µM) and/or G-15 (10 µM) for 48 h to study steroidogenesis. RESULTS: Both BPA and BPS (10 µM) altered the secretion of progesterone, however, only BPS (10 µM) affected oestradiol secretion. RNA-seq was performed on GC after 1 h of culture with BPA or BPS (50 µM) or G-1 (10 µM), followed by real-time PCR analyses of differentially expressed genes after 12, 24 and 48 h of culture. The absence of induced GPER target genes showed that BPA and BPS did not activate GPER in GC after 1 h of treatment. These molecules exhibited mainly independent early mechanisms of action. Gene ontology analysis showed that after 1 h of treatment, BPA mainly disrupted the expression of the genes involved in metabolism and transcription, while BPS had a smaller effect and impaired cellular communications. BPA had a transient effect on the expression of CHAC1 (NOTCH signalling and oxidative balance), JUN (linked to MAPK pathway), NR4A1 (oestradiol secretion inhibition), ARRDC4 (endocytose of GPCR) and KLF10 (cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis), while expression changes were maintained over time for the genes LSMEM1 (linked to MAPK pathway), TXNIP (oxidative stress) and LIF (cell cycle regulation) after 12 and 48 h, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, although they exhibited similar effects, BPA and BPS impaired different molecular pathways in GC in vitro. New investigations will be necessary to follow the temporal changes of these genes over time, as well as the biological processes involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-023-01114-4. BioMed Central 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9896735/ /pubmed/36737804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01114-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Téteau, Ophélie
Vitorino Carvalho, Anaïs
Papillier, Pascal
Mandon-Pépin, Béatrice
Jouneau, Luc
Jarrier-Gaillard, Peggy
Desmarchais, Alice
Lebachelier de la Riviere, Marie-Emilie
Vignault, Claire
Maillard, Virginie
Binet, Aurélien
Uzbekova, Svetlana
Elis, Sebastien
Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title_full Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title_fullStr Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title_full_unstemmed Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title_short Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
title_sort bisphenol a and bisphenol s both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01114-4
work_keys_str_mv AT teteauophelie bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT vitorinocarvalhoanais bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT papillierpascal bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT mandonpepinbeatrice bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT jouneauluc bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT jarriergaillardpeggy bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT desmarchaisalice bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT lebachelierdelarivieremarieemilie bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT vignaultclaire bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT maillardvirginie bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT binetaurelien bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT uzbekovasvetlana bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways
AT elissebastien bisphenolaandbisphenolsbothdisruptovinegranulosacellsteroidogenesisbutthroughdifferentmolecularpathways