Cargando…

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Daoan, Zhao, Weiqing, Chen, Rui, Li, Dong, Tang, Shuxian, Fang, Cheng, Ji, Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02915-z
_version_ 1784882117318017024
author Cheng, Daoan
Zhao, Weiqing
Chen, Rui
Li, Dong
Tang, Shuxian
Fang, Cheng
Ji, Mei
author_facet Cheng, Daoan
Zhao, Weiqing
Chen, Rui
Li, Dong
Tang, Shuxian
Fang, Cheng
Ji, Mei
author_sort Cheng, Daoan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy because of the intolerable adverse effects in China. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery has become an emerging treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. There was still no consensus on whether nICT was superior to nCT alone in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received surgery after nICT (n=26, 40%) or nCT alone (n=39, 60%) were included. The patients were classified as nICT or nCT arm. The primary endpoints were pathological tumor response (PTR) and event-free survival (EFS). The different clinic-pathological features were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square (χ(2)) test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate EFS from the date of treatment to recurrence or death. All tests were 2-sided with a significative P-value defined <.05. RESULTS: Three (11.5%) of the 26 patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) in the nICT group, and four (10.3%) of the 39 patients achieved pCR in the nCT group, respectively (P=1.000). Six (23.1%) of the 26 patients achieved major pathological response (MPR) in the nICT group, and 11 (28.2%) of the 39 patients achieved MPR in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.645). Downstaging was achieved in 13 (44.8%) patients in the nICT group and 16 (55.2%) patients in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.732). To verify the tumor regression grade (TRG) results, we compared them with MPR and pCR, which showed a significant dependency (P< 0.001). Patients who achieved downgrading showed better MPR and pCR rates (P<0.001 and P =0.010). There was no significant difference in EFS between the nICT and nCT groups (HR=1.011, 95% CI: 0.421–2.425, P = 0.981). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, more studies with long-term follow-up were needed to confirm this result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9896760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98967602023-02-04 Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma Cheng, Daoan Zhao, Weiqing Chen, Rui Li, Dong Tang, Shuxian Fang, Cheng Ji, Mei World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy because of the intolerable adverse effects in China. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery has become an emerging treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. There was still no consensus on whether nICT was superior to nCT alone in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received surgery after nICT (n=26, 40%) or nCT alone (n=39, 60%) were included. The patients were classified as nICT or nCT arm. The primary endpoints were pathological tumor response (PTR) and event-free survival (EFS). The different clinic-pathological features were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square (χ(2)) test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate EFS from the date of treatment to recurrence or death. All tests were 2-sided with a significative P-value defined <.05. RESULTS: Three (11.5%) of the 26 patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) in the nICT group, and four (10.3%) of the 39 patients achieved pCR in the nCT group, respectively (P=1.000). Six (23.1%) of the 26 patients achieved major pathological response (MPR) in the nICT group, and 11 (28.2%) of the 39 patients achieved MPR in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.645). Downstaging was achieved in 13 (44.8%) patients in the nICT group and 16 (55.2%) patients in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.732). To verify the tumor regression grade (TRG) results, we compared them with MPR and pCR, which showed a significant dependency (P< 0.001). Patients who achieved downgrading showed better MPR and pCR rates (P<0.001 and P =0.010). There was no significant difference in EFS between the nICT and nCT groups (HR=1.011, 95% CI: 0.421–2.425, P = 0.981). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, more studies with long-term follow-up were needed to confirm this result. BioMed Central 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9896760/ /pubmed/36737768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02915-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cheng, Daoan
Zhao, Weiqing
Chen, Rui
Li, Dong
Tang, Shuxian
Fang, Cheng
Ji, Mei
Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title_full Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title_short Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
title_sort neoadjuvant pd-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02915-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chengdaoan neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT zhaoweiqing neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT chenrui neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT lidong neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT tangshuxian neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT fangcheng neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma
AT jimei neoadjuvantpd1blockadecombinedwithchemotherapyisnotsuperiortoneoadjuvantchemotherapyaloneinresectablelocallyadvancedesophagealcarcinoma