Cargando…

Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience

RATIONALE: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic led to drastic social restrictions globally. Early data suggest that women in science have been more adversely affected by these lockdowns than men, with relatively fewer scientific articles authored by women. However, these observations test broad populations with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, M., Tuke, J., Hutchinson, M.R., Spencer, S.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115761
_version_ 1784882135897735168
author Ryan, M.
Tuke, J.
Hutchinson, M.R.
Spencer, S.J.
author_facet Ryan, M.
Tuke, J.
Hutchinson, M.R.
Spencer, S.J.
author_sort Ryan, M.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic led to drastic social restrictions globally. Early data suggest that women in science have been more adversely affected by these lockdowns than men, with relatively fewer scientific articles authored by women. However, these observations test broad populations with many potential causes of disparity. Australia presents a natural experimental condition where several states of similar demographics and disease impact had differing approaches in their social isolation strategies. The state of Victoria experienced 280 days of lockdowns from 2020 to 2021, whereas the comparable state of New South Wales experienced 107 days, most of these in 2021, and other states even fewer restrictions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To assess how the gender balance changed in Australian biomedical publishing with the lockdowns, we created a custom workflow to analyse PubMed data from more than 120,000 published articles submitted in 2019–2021 from Australian authors. RESULTS: Broadly, Australian women have been incredibly resilient to the challenges faced by the lockdowns. There was an increase in the number of published articles submitted in 2020 that was equally due to women as men, including from Victoria. On the other hand, articles specifically addressing COVID-19 were significantly less likely to be authored by women than those on other topics, a finding not likely due to particular gender imbalance in virology or viral epidemiology, since publications on HIV followed similar patterns to previous years. By 2021, this imbalance had reversed, with more COVID-19-related papers authored by women than men. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest women from Victoria were less able to rapidly transition to new research early in the pandemic but had accommodated to the new conditions by 2021. This work indicates we need strategies to support women in science as the pandemic continues and to continue to monitor the situation for its impact on vulnerable groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9896855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98968552023-02-06 Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience Ryan, M. Tuke, J. Hutchinson, M.R. Spencer, S.J. Soc Sci Med Article RATIONALE: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic led to drastic social restrictions globally. Early data suggest that women in science have been more adversely affected by these lockdowns than men, with relatively fewer scientific articles authored by women. However, these observations test broad populations with many potential causes of disparity. Australia presents a natural experimental condition where several states of similar demographics and disease impact had differing approaches in their social isolation strategies. The state of Victoria experienced 280 days of lockdowns from 2020 to 2021, whereas the comparable state of New South Wales experienced 107 days, most of these in 2021, and other states even fewer restrictions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To assess how the gender balance changed in Australian biomedical publishing with the lockdowns, we created a custom workflow to analyse PubMed data from more than 120,000 published articles submitted in 2019–2021 from Australian authors. RESULTS: Broadly, Australian women have been incredibly resilient to the challenges faced by the lockdowns. There was an increase in the number of published articles submitted in 2020 that was equally due to women as men, including from Victoria. On the other hand, articles specifically addressing COVID-19 were significantly less likely to be authored by women than those on other topics, a finding not likely due to particular gender imbalance in virology or viral epidemiology, since publications on HIV followed similar patterns to previous years. By 2021, this imbalance had reversed, with more COVID-19-related papers authored by women than men. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest women from Victoria were less able to rapidly transition to new research early in the pandemic but had accommodated to the new conditions by 2021. This work indicates we need strategies to support women in science as the pandemic continues and to continue to monitor the situation for its impact on vulnerable groups. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-03 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9896855/ /pubmed/36780736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115761 Text en © 2023 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ryan, M.
Tuke, J.
Hutchinson, M.R.
Spencer, S.J.
Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title_full Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title_fullStr Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title_full_unstemmed Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title_short Gender-specific effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: Impact and resilience
title_sort gender-specific effects of covid-19 lockdowns on scientific publishing productivity: impact and resilience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115761
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanm genderspecificeffectsofcovid19lockdownsonscientificpublishingproductivityimpactandresilience
AT tukej genderspecificeffectsofcovid19lockdownsonscientificpublishingproductivityimpactandresilience
AT hutchinsonmr genderspecificeffectsofcovid19lockdownsonscientificpublishingproductivityimpactandresilience
AT spencersj genderspecificeffectsofcovid19lockdownsonscientificpublishingproductivityimpactandresilience