Cargando…

Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled applications are increasingly being used in providing healthcare services, such as medical imaging support. Sufficient and appropriate education for medical imaging professionals is required for successful AI adoption. Although, currently, there are A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Venter, Riaan, Skelton, Emily, Matthew, Jacqueline, Woznitza, Nick, Tarroni, Giacomo, Hirani, Shashivadan P., Kumar, Amrita, Malik, Rizwan, Malamateniou, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01372-2
_version_ 1784882192195780608
author van de Venter, Riaan
Skelton, Emily
Matthew, Jacqueline
Woznitza, Nick
Tarroni, Giacomo
Hirani, Shashivadan P.
Kumar, Amrita
Malik, Rizwan
Malamateniou, Christina
author_facet van de Venter, Riaan
Skelton, Emily
Matthew, Jacqueline
Woznitza, Nick
Tarroni, Giacomo
Hirani, Shashivadan P.
Kumar, Amrita
Malik, Rizwan
Malamateniou, Christina
author_sort van de Venter, Riaan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled applications are increasingly being used in providing healthcare services, such as medical imaging support. Sufficient and appropriate education for medical imaging professionals is required for successful AI adoption. Although, currently, there are AI training programmes for radiologists, formal AI education for radiographers is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and discuss a postgraduate-level module on AI developed in the UK for radiographers. METHODOLOGY: A participatory action research methodology was applied, with participants recruited from the first cohort of students enrolled in this module and faculty members. Data were collected using online, semi-structured, individual interviews and focus group discussions. Textual data were processed using data-driven thematic analysis. RESULTS: Seven students and six faculty members participated in this evaluation. Results can be summarised in the following four themes: a. participants’ professional and educational backgrounds influenced their experiences, b. participants found the learning experience meaningful concerning module design, organisation, and pedagogical approaches, c. some module design and delivery aspects were identified as barriers to learning, and d. participants suggested how the ideal AI course could look like based on their experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our work show that an AI module can assist educators/academics in developing similar AI education provisions for radiographers and other medical imaging and radiation sciences professionals. A blended learning delivery format, combined with customisable and contextualised content, using an interprofessional faculty approach is recommended for future similar courses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9897152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98971522023-02-05 Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study van de Venter, Riaan Skelton, Emily Matthew, Jacqueline Woznitza, Nick Tarroni, Giacomo Hirani, Shashivadan P. Kumar, Amrita Malik, Rizwan Malamateniou, Christina Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled applications are increasingly being used in providing healthcare services, such as medical imaging support. Sufficient and appropriate education for medical imaging professionals is required for successful AI adoption. Although, currently, there are AI training programmes for radiologists, formal AI education for radiographers is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and discuss a postgraduate-level module on AI developed in the UK for radiographers. METHODOLOGY: A participatory action research methodology was applied, with participants recruited from the first cohort of students enrolled in this module and faculty members. Data were collected using online, semi-structured, individual interviews and focus group discussions. Textual data were processed using data-driven thematic analysis. RESULTS: Seven students and six faculty members participated in this evaluation. Results can be summarised in the following four themes: a. participants’ professional and educational backgrounds influenced their experiences, b. participants found the learning experience meaningful concerning module design, organisation, and pedagogical approaches, c. some module design and delivery aspects were identified as barriers to learning, and d. participants suggested how the ideal AI course could look like based on their experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our work show that an AI module can assist educators/academics in developing similar AI education provisions for radiographers and other medical imaging and radiation sciences professionals. A blended learning delivery format, combined with customisable and contextualised content, using an interprofessional faculty approach is recommended for future similar courses. Springer Vienna 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9897152/ /pubmed/36735172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01372-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van de Venter, Riaan
Skelton, Emily
Matthew, Jacqueline
Woznitza, Nick
Tarroni, Giacomo
Hirani, Shashivadan P.
Kumar, Amrita
Malik, Rizwan
Malamateniou, Christina
Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title_full Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title_short Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
title_sort artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a uk postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01372-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeventerriaan artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT skeltonemily artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT matthewjacqueline artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT woznitzanick artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT tarronigiacomo artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT hiranishashivadanp artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT kumaramrita artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT malikrizwan artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy
AT malamateniouchristina artificialintelligenceeducationforradiographersanevaluationofaukpostgraduateeducationalinterventionusingparticipatoryactionresearchapilotstudy