Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) drape removal from the skin may be painful for patients and inadvertently cause skin damage during the length of therapy. Most NPWT drapes utilize an acrylate adhesive to achieve the seal. To improve the experience associated with NPWT drape removal, a novel hy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNulty, Amy K, Wilkes, Robert, Bjork, Jason, Turnbull, Michael, Sieracki, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751188
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33412
_version_ 1784882304539164672
author McNulty, Amy K
Wilkes, Robert
Bjork, Jason
Turnbull, Michael
Sieracki, James
author_facet McNulty, Amy K
Wilkes, Robert
Bjork, Jason
Turnbull, Michael
Sieracki, James
author_sort McNulty, Amy K
collection PubMed
description Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) drape removal from the skin may be painful for patients and inadvertently cause skin damage during the length of therapy. Most NPWT drapes utilize an acrylate adhesive to achieve the seal. To improve the experience associated with NPWT drape removal, a novel hybrid drape was developed. This drape is composed of areas of acrylate adhesive and areas of silicone adhesive. To more fully understand how the removal of the hybrid drape versus the acrylate drape affects the skin, drape removal models were developed to assess the differences in strain profiles for acrylate versus hybrid NPWT drapes using finite element analysis (FEA) to measure the strain and deformation that occurs at the tissue interface with the NPWT drape. The FEA modeling showed that the maximum principal strain associated with the removal of the acrylate drape was 47.3%, whereas the maximum principal strain associated with the removal of the hybrid drape was 21.5%. The average peel force associated with the acrylate drape was 66.1 gf/in, while the peel force for the hybrid drape was 112.5 gf/in. NPWT drape removal may, in certain instances, be related to pain and periwound skin injury. The hybrid drape tested may provide clinicians with an option for NPWT that is gentler for the skin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9897684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98976842023-02-06 Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes McNulty, Amy K Wilkes, Robert Bjork, Jason Turnbull, Michael Sieracki, James Cureus Dermatology Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) drape removal from the skin may be painful for patients and inadvertently cause skin damage during the length of therapy. Most NPWT drapes utilize an acrylate adhesive to achieve the seal. To improve the experience associated with NPWT drape removal, a novel hybrid drape was developed. This drape is composed of areas of acrylate adhesive and areas of silicone adhesive. To more fully understand how the removal of the hybrid drape versus the acrylate drape affects the skin, drape removal models were developed to assess the differences in strain profiles for acrylate versus hybrid NPWT drapes using finite element analysis (FEA) to measure the strain and deformation that occurs at the tissue interface with the NPWT drape. The FEA modeling showed that the maximum principal strain associated with the removal of the acrylate drape was 47.3%, whereas the maximum principal strain associated with the removal of the hybrid drape was 21.5%. The average peel force associated with the acrylate drape was 66.1 gf/in, while the peel force for the hybrid drape was 112.5 gf/in. NPWT drape removal may, in certain instances, be related to pain and periwound skin injury. The hybrid drape tested may provide clinicians with an option for NPWT that is gentler for the skin. Cureus 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9897684/ /pubmed/36751188 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33412 Text en Copyright © 2023, McNulty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dermatology
McNulty, Amy K
Wilkes, Robert
Bjork, Jason
Turnbull, Michael
Sieracki, James
Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title_full Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title_short Finite Element Analysis Modelling of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Drapes
title_sort finite element analysis modelling of negative pressure wound therapy drapes
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751188
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33412
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnultyamyk finiteelementanalysismodellingofnegativepressurewoundtherapydrapes
AT wilkesrobert finiteelementanalysismodellingofnegativepressurewoundtherapydrapes
AT bjorkjason finiteelementanalysismodellingofnegativepressurewoundtherapydrapes
AT turnbullmichael finiteelementanalysismodellingofnegativepressurewoundtherapydrapes
AT sierackijames finiteelementanalysismodellingofnegativepressurewoundtherapydrapes