Cargando…

European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic increased multiple risk factors for mental health. Evidence-based, intersectoral public mental health responses are therefore critical. The primary aim of this study was to collate public mental health responses from across Europe. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Naomi, McDaid, Shari, Wieber, Frank, Lindert, Jutta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac169
_version_ 1784882359881957376
author Wilson, Naomi
McDaid, Shari
Wieber, Frank
Lindert, Jutta
author_facet Wilson, Naomi
McDaid, Shari
Wieber, Frank
Lindert, Jutta
author_sort Wilson, Naomi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic increased multiple risk factors for mental health. Evidence-based, intersectoral public mental health responses are therefore critical. The primary aim of this study was to collate public mental health responses from across Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in March 2021. Participants were public and mental health professionals from across Europe. We developed an online instrument exploring five domains: changes in mental health supports during the pandemic; mental health support for vulnerable groups; multi-sectoral and service-user involvement; published mental health response plans; and perceived quality of overall country response. RESULTS: Fifty-two individuals from 20 European nations responded. Reported changes in mental health supports included an increase in online mental health supports (n = 18); but no change in long-term mental health funding (n = 13); and a decrease in access to early interventions (n = 9). Responses indicated mental health support for vulnerable groups was limited, as was multi-sectoral and service-user involvement. Few national mental health response plans existed (n = 9) and 48% of respondents felt their countries mental health response had been ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’. CONCLUSIONS: Our results give insights into the changes in mental health support at a country level across Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic. They indicate countries were not prepared to respond and people with existing vulnerabilities were often neglected in response planning. To be prepared for future pandemics and environmental disasters Public Mental Health preparedness plans are highly needed. These must be developed cross-departmentally, and through the meaningful inclusion of vulnerable groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9897993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98979932023-02-06 European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic Wilson, Naomi McDaid, Shari Wieber, Frank Lindert, Jutta Eur J Public Health Mental Health BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic increased multiple risk factors for mental health. Evidence-based, intersectoral public mental health responses are therefore critical. The primary aim of this study was to collate public mental health responses from across Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in March 2021. Participants were public and mental health professionals from across Europe. We developed an online instrument exploring five domains: changes in mental health supports during the pandemic; mental health support for vulnerable groups; multi-sectoral and service-user involvement; published mental health response plans; and perceived quality of overall country response. RESULTS: Fifty-two individuals from 20 European nations responded. Reported changes in mental health supports included an increase in online mental health supports (n = 18); but no change in long-term mental health funding (n = 13); and a decrease in access to early interventions (n = 9). Responses indicated mental health support for vulnerable groups was limited, as was multi-sectoral and service-user involvement. Few national mental health response plans existed (n = 9) and 48% of respondents felt their countries mental health response had been ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’. CONCLUSIONS: Our results give insights into the changes in mental health support at a country level across Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic. They indicate countries were not prepared to respond and people with existing vulnerabilities were often neglected in response planning. To be prepared for future pandemics and environmental disasters Public Mental Health preparedness plans are highly needed. These must be developed cross-departmentally, and through the meaningful inclusion of vulnerable groups. Oxford University Press 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9897993/ /pubmed/36410002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac169 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Wilson, Naomi
McDaid, Shari
Wieber, Frank
Lindert, Jutta
European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short European public mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort european public mental health responses to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac169
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonnaomi europeanpublicmentalhealthresponsestothecovid19pandemic
AT mcdaidshari europeanpublicmentalhealthresponsestothecovid19pandemic
AT wieberfrank europeanpublicmentalhealthresponsestothecovid19pandemic
AT lindertjutta europeanpublicmentalhealthresponsestothecovid19pandemic